Agro Hemp Iberia

Integrity

The issuance record from 2024-12-17 names Trusted Carbon as the verifier, but it does not state any additionality test, baseline method, or baseline reassessment timing. Leakage treatment, buffer pool coverage, and reversal information are also not found, which leaves permanence and quantification robustness weakly supported.

Transparency

Transparency is low because the extracted record contains only one document and omits the monitoring period, verified issuance quantity, and usage monitoring method. The presence of a named verifier helps slightly, but the MRV trail is otherwise thin.

Claim Safety

Claim safety is weak because the project’s baseline approach and leakage justification are not stated, making over-crediting risk difficult to assess. CORSIA eligibility and CCP status are also not stated, so the record does not resolve whether there is any dual-claim exposure.

Documentation

Documentation quality is limited by the fact that only one issuance document was used, even though extraction confidence is high. No material findings or corrective actions are reported, but the absence of supporting monitoring and methodology documents leaves major evidence gaps.

Overall

The project cannot be scored as robustly documented from the available issuance record alone. There are no contradictions to resolve in the extracted facts, but the absence of core methodological and MRV details materially weakens confidence across all dimensions. Because the evidence base is narrow and key safeguards are unstated, the overall assessment remains very low.