Eastview Ag
Score Breakdown
Integrity
verified Additionality was confirmed by the VVB in the verification report.
missing Baseline method, leakage deduction, and buffer pool coverage are not stated in the available documents.
Transparency
missing The extracted record does not state the claimed or verified emission reduction totals, limiting MRV transparency.
inferred The monitoring period is identified as 2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31, but the core monitoring methodology is not found in the available documents.
Claim Safety
missing No baseline method, leakage justification, or usage-rate evidence is available to test over-crediting risk.
inferred The registry status is not stated as CORSIA-eligible or CCP-approved, so dual-claim risk cannot be ruled out from the extracted record.
Documentation
verified Two documents were used, including a verification report dated 2025-05-16 from Control Union Malaysia.
missing The extraction confidence is only medium and several key fields are not stated, including methodology, baseline, and safeguard details.
Detailed Analysis
Integrity
The verification report from Control Union Malaysia confirms additionality, which is a positive sign for project integrity. That said, the available record does not state the baseline method, leakage deduction, buffer pool percentage, or any reversal history, so permanence and baseline robustness cannot be well assessed. No material findings or corrective actions were reported, which helps, but the evidence remains incomplete.
Transparency
Transparency is limited because the extracted record does not provide the claimed or verified emission reduction totals, nor does it state the monitoring or usage methodology. The monitoring period is clear, but the absence of core MRV figures makes it difficult to evaluate whether the reported removals are fully supported. The medium extraction confidence also suggests at least one key document was not perfectly readable.
Claim Safety
Claim safety is weak because the record does not state the baseline method, leakage treatment, or any verified usage-rate information. Without those inputs, the risk of over-crediting cannot be checked properly. CORSIA eligibility and CCP status are also not stated, so the possibility of broader market-claim ambiguity remains unresolved.
Documentation
Documentation quality is modest: two documents were used, including a verification report dated 2025-05-16, and the VVB is identified. However, the extracted record leaves many core fields blank, including methodology, baseline, leakage, safeguards, and emission totals. The medium extraction confidence further reduces confidence that the available documentation is complete.
Overall
The project shows some positive integrity signals, especially VVB-confirmed additionality and no reported material findings. However, the record is missing several critical elements needed to judge credit quality, and the low level of disclosed MRV detail weighs on transparency and claim safety. There are no explicit contradictions to resolve in the extracted facts, but the absence of key values means the assessment must remain conservative.
Audit Analysis
The project has some integrity support because the VVB confirmed additionality and the verification report reported no material findings. However, key baseline, leakage, permanence, and safeguard details are not stated in the available record, which limits confidence in the crediting claim. Transparency is weak because the extracted documents do not provide the core MRV figures needed to assess over-crediting risk.
Project Description
Credits issued: 724
Red Flags
- Baseline method, leakage treatment, and buffer pool information are not stated in the available documents.
- No verified error totals, usage monitoring details, or safeguard documentation were found in the extracted record.
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 724 | 0 | 724 | |
| Total | 724 | 0 | 724 |
Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio
- Provide the full baseline, leakage, and permanence documentation, including any buffer pool or reversal treatment.
- Disclose verified emission reduction totals, monitoring methodology, and safeguard evidence such as FPIC and grievance procedures.
Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed additionality
No buffer or reversal data stated
Leakage not addressed in extracted record
Baseline method not stated
No safeguards documentation found
CORSIA/CCP status not stated
Where to buy
+ Know where to buy this?
Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].
⚑ Dispute this rating
Registry Documents
Sei il proprietario di questo progetto?
Correzione metadati (gratuita)
Nome, paese, marketplace o link errati? Segnalacelo.
Non modifica lo score.
[email protected] →Rivalutazione con nuovi documenti
Hai documentazione aggiornata non ancora inclusa? Puoi richiedere un nuovo run della pipeline con i nuovi input.
Invia Documenti →