Skip to main content
CDMLandfill gasBrazilACM0001

Alto-Tietê landfill gas capture project

CDM-1636 ↗

#18of 64 in Methane#20of 104 in Brazil#56of 213 in CDM (UNFCCC)#15of 53 in ACM0001

5.5/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
5.5
Claim Safety
5.5
Documentation
5.5

Audit Analysis

The Alto-Tietê landfill gas flaring project has a solid additionality foundation (VVB-confirmed investment test) and inherently low permanence risk as an avoidance project, but is undermined by ten material findings in the validation report—including calculation errors, missing monitoring parameters, and incorrect fugitive emissions treatment. The project is under-delivering relative to its ex-ante estimate (approximately 34% of pro-rata expectation in the first monitoring period), which is conservative for claim safety but signals potential over-estimation in the baseline. Three contradictions across documents, particularly a 77% discrepancy in the grid emission factor, reduce confidence in the baseline's accuracy.

Red Flags

  • Ten material findings in the validation report, including errors in ex-ante baseline calculations, incorrect fugitive emissions treatment, and missing monitoring parameters for PEflare,y and energy demand
  • Grid emission factor discrepancy of 77% between the PDD (0.10425) and the monitoring report (0.1842), raising questions about baseline accuracy
  • Baseline type contradiction: the PDD describes a 'measured' baseline while the validation report confirms a 'modeled' (FOD) baseline, indicating the project-specific baseline is less robust than initially presented
  • First monitoring period delivered only ~34% of the pro-rata ex-ante expectation, suggesting the lifetime estimate may be overly optimistic or the project is underperforming

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed investment test

Permanence

Avoidance project, no reversal risk

Leakage

Deemed negligible, no quantified deduction

Baseline

Project-specific modeled baseline, contradictions

Safeguards

Mentioned but FPIC and grievance not detailed

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-25ACM0001

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents