Ana Primavesi – Sustainable Farming and Restoration Program
#171of 261 in Soil carbon#152of 211 in Brazil#1090of 1339 in Verra (VCS)#69of 97 in AR-ACM0003
Audit Analysis
The Ana Primavesi project is a large-scale agroforestry and restoration initiative in Brazil (416,035 tCO₂e over a 41-year crediting period) that has passed validation with EPIC Sustainability as VVB, but the validation report surfaced 29 material findings and 13 corrective actions covering baseline definition, REDD+ double-counting risk, communal land tenure, and monitoring design. The 18% buffer pool and 0% leakage deduction (deemed negligible) are thin for a project operating in a high-deforestation-pressure country, and the absence of any monitoring or verification data means the project remains entirely at the ex-ante estimation stage.
Red Flags
- 29 material findings and 13 corrective actions identified in the validation report, spanning baseline scenarios, geographic area definitions, stratification, monitoring plan errors, and land-tenure clarity
- Risk of double counting with Brazil's jurisdictional REDD+ programs was not initially assessed and remains an open corrective action
- Leakage deduction of 0% justified only as 'deemed negligible' with no quantified analysis, in a country with significant deforestation and land-use-change pressure
- Buffer pool of 18% is below the 20% typically applied to VCS ALM projects, and the adaptive management plan was not initially assessed as required by the VCS Non-permanence Risk Tool
- Communal land ownership, indigenous territory overlap, and quilombo land consent processes were flagged as unclear in the Project Description
Credit Vintages
No issuances recorded on the registry.
Risk Indicators
Combined test VVB-verified, but common-practice and alternative-land-use analyses flagged for correction
18% buffer pool, no reversals, but adaptive management plan not initially assessed
0% deduction on 'deemed negligible' basis with no quantified justification
Project-specific baseline; not yet due for 10-year reassessment; scenario and stratification issues flagged
FPIC and grievance mechanism present, but communal land tenure and indigenous-territory overlap flagged as unclear
CORSIA and CCP status not stated; REDD+ double-counting risk not initially assessed
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →