Anew - Arrowhead Forestry Project
#23of 99 in REDD+#103of 345 in United States#42of 147 in American Carbon Registry (ACR)
Audit Analysis
The Arrowhead Forestry Project is a 20-year improved forest management project in Minnesota with a 28% buffer pool, 30% quantified leakage deduction, and VVB-verified additionality. However, the validation report identified eight non-conformities—including a fire-risk score initially set at 2% rather than the correct 8%—and the first monitoring period delivered roughly 190% of the pro-rata ex-ante expectation, raising questions about baseline conservatism. Safeguards documentation is incomplete, with no FPIC or grievance mechanism on record.
Red Flags
- Eight non-conformities in the validation report, including a fire-risk score initially set at 2% instead of the correct 8% due to the Greenwood Fire within 30 miles, and buffer pool not correctly deducted from Total ERRs to produce Net ERRs
- First monitoring period verified ERRs (82,263 tCO₂e) are approximately 190% of the pro-rata lifetime ex-ante expectation (~43,193 tCO₂e for one year of a 20-year crediting period), suggesting the ex-ante estimate may be overly conservative or the baseline may understate business-as-usual sequestration
- Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) was not conducted and no grievance mechanism is documented, despite the project being on non-federal U.S. forestlands where community engagement is expected
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 85,152 | 0 | 85,152 | |
| 2023 | 29,139 | 0 | 29,139 | |
| Total | 114,291 | 0 | 114,291 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed combined test
Buffer present but fire risk initially miscalculated
30% quantified deduction
Project-specific; reassessment timing not stated
Safeguards mentioned; FPIC and grievance mechanism absent
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →