Anew - Ashland County Forestry Project
#5of 99 in REDD+#19of 345 in United States#10of 147 in American Carbon Registry (ACR)
Audit Analysis
A Wisconsin forest-carbon project under ACR with a solid additionality assessment (combined test, VVB-confirmed), a 16% buffer pool, no reported reversals, and a quantified 30% leakage deduction. The main weaknesses are a project-specific modeled baseline, a first-year verified removal that is roughly 2.7× the pro-rata share of the lifetime ex-ante estimate, and several eligibility fields (CORSIA, CCP, FNRB) left unstated. Documentation is recent and from a reputable VVB, with only minor clarifications raised.
Red Flags
- First-year verified removals (96,868 tCO₂e) are approximately 268% of the pro-rata expectation derived from the 20-year lifetime ex-ante estimate (722,674 tCO₂e ÷ 20 ≈ 36,134 tCO₂e/yr), raising questions about whether the ex-ante baseline was overly conservative or the monitoring captured atypically high sequestration.
- Baseline is project-specific and modeled rather than jurisdictional or field-measured, which increases sensitivity to assumptions about reference forest growth.
- CORSIA eligibility and CCP status are not stated in any available document, leaving dual-channel or over-crediting risk unassessed.
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 73,248 | 0 | 73,248 | |
| 2023 | 23,620 | 0 | 23,620 | |
| Total | 96,868 | 0 | 96,868 |
Risk Indicators
Combined test, VVB-confirmed
16% buffer pool, no reversals
30% quantified deduction
Project-specific, modeled
Safeguards mentioned, FPIC not conducted, grievance mechanism not stated
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →