Skip to main content
ACRForest CarbonWEST VIRGINIA; VIRGINIA, USGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Anew - Big Poplar Forestry Project

ACR-851 ↗

#7of 99 in REDD+#21of 345 in United States#12of 147 in American Carbon Registry (ACR)

6.5/ 10
Integrity
6.5
Transparency
6.5
Claim Safety
6.5
Documentation
6.5

Audit Analysis

The Big Poplar Forestry Project is a well-structured ACR improved-forest-management project with VVB-verified additionality, a quantified 30% leakage deduction, and an 18.45% buffer pool. The main concerns are the project-specific modeled baseline (rather than a jurisdictional or measured baseline), the absence of documented FPIC and grievance mechanisms, and a 33% discrepancy in the ex-ante lifetime ERR between the PDD and an appendix. The project delivered approximately 123% of its pro-rata expectation for the elapsed monitoring period, indicating a conservative ex-ante estimate.

Red Flags

  • Ex-ante lifetime ERR differs by 33% between the PDD (6,061,945 tCO₂e) and an appendix (4,562,904 tCO₂e), creating uncertainty about the true baseline removals estimate.
  • Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) was not conducted and no grievance mechanism is documented, despite safeguards being mentioned in the project documents.
  • The baseline is project-specific and modeled rather than jurisdictional or field-measured, increasing sensitivity to assumptions in the FVS growth model and site-index coefficients.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2022
552,4120552,412
2023
469,64258,224411,418
2024
373,45932,777340,682
2025
91,834091,834
Total1,487,34791,0011,396,346

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-verified combined test

Permanence

18.45% buffer pool, no reversals

Leakage

30% quantified deduction

Baseline

Project-specific, modeled, 2025 reassessment

Safeguards

Mentioned but FPIC and grievance mechanism absent

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-12General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents