Skip to main content
ACRForest CarbonUSGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Anew - Buckeye State Forestry Project

ACR-792 ↗

#76of 145 in REDD+#231of 389 in United States#126of 195 in American Carbon Registry (ACR)

4.8/ 10
Integrity
4.5
Transparency
5.5
Claim Safety
5.2
Documentation
3.8

Audit Analysis

The Buckeye State Forestry Project has the core structural elements of a credible REDD project—VVB-verified additionality, a 22% buffer pool, and a substantial 40% leakage deduction—but the validation report reveals 22 findings (4 non-conformities and 18 issues) spanning ownership boundaries, fire-risk underestimation, and baseline documentation gaps that collectively undermine confidence in the 84,395-tonne claim. The low extraction confidence and an 'unknown' document type in the evidence set further weaken the evidentiary base.

Red Flags

  • Four non-conformity reports (NCRs) identified in the validation report, including a biomass unit-conversion error and a missing VVB verification history statement, indicating material procedural non-compliance
  • NIR 11 and NIR 22 flag parcels within the project boundary that are not owned by the project proponent, raising questions about whether the claimed 84,395 tonnes include reductions from land outside the proponent's control
  • NIR 9 identifies that the fire risk score was underestimated despite the Kimble Complex wildfire occurring within 30 miles, directly challenging the adequacy of the 22% buffer pool
  • FPIC was not conducted and no grievance mechanism is documented, despite safeguards being mentioned in the project documents
  • Minimum extraction confidence is rated low, meaning at least one key document was poorly readable and the full evidentiary picture may be incomplete

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2022
40,926040,926
2023
43,469043,469
Total84,395084,395

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test

Permanence

Buffer present but fire risk underestimated

Leakage

40% quantified deduction

Baseline

Project-specific; documentation gaps flagged

Safeguards

Mentioned but FPIC not conducted; no grievance mechanism

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-12General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents