Skip to main content
ACRForest CarbonMAINE, USGeneral Methodologyv2.0

Anew - Cassidy Forestry Project

ACR-1003 ↗

#60of 69 in REDD+#104of 115 in United States#41of 45 in American Carbon Registry (ACR)

1.6/ 10
Integrity
0.5
Transparency
2.0
Claim Safety
2.0
Documentation
3.0

Audit Analysis

The project currently relies solely on a single design document with no verification or monitoring data available. Critical elements such as additionality testing, baseline methodology, buffer pool contributions, and leakage treatment are entirely missing from the record. Until independent verification reports and post-design monitoring data are published, quality remains highly uncertain.

Red Flags

  • No independent verifier confirmation or additionality assessment found
  • Baseline methodology and leakage justification completely absent
  • CORSIA eligibility and carbon credit program status undocumented
  • Leakage not addressed in project documentation
  • Buffer pool size not disclosed in available documents

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

No assessment found

Permanence

Buffer pool absent/unaddressed

Leakage

Leakage not addressed

Baseline

Method not stated

Safeguards

None documented

Double-claim

Status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-06General Methodology v2.0

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents