CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index

Rated

Anew - Elk Forestry Project

Standard
ACR
Methodology
ACR-IFM-US (ACR)
Registry
ACR-595 ↗ · Registered
Country
KENTUCKY, United States
Credit type
Forest Carbon
Developer
Anew Carbon Development, LLC
Worked comparison example (English)

CarbonMeld's document-based rating gives Anew - Elk Forestry Project (ACR-595) 7.0 out of 10 (High rating) under CarbonMeld methodology v3, documents read on 17 Oct 2026. The analysis read 14 of the 14 registry documents. It is CarbonMeld's own assessment, not a rating given by the registry or the standard.

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based rating

01020304 Document-based rating 7.0 / 10
Additionality 🔒 Quantification 🔒 Permanence 🔒 Claim safety 🔒
The dimension values are in Premium — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero values.

Document-based rating

7.0/10

High rating (6.5 or more)

Evidence coverage: high

How solid the credit is, as far as the registry's public documents show. Additionality and quantification start from a public grade; permanence starts at 5.0, the neutral point, where none applies, and claim safety always does.

Methodology v3 · documents read on 17 Oct 2026

Starting point

  • Additionality: the registry's CCP label on this project's credits
  • Quantification: the registry's CCP label on this project's credits
  • Permanence: the registry's CCP label on this project's credits
  • Claim safety: neutral (5.0) — no public grade of this type of project applies

Rules that raised the number: 4

Each rule, with the fact and the source it rests on, is in the Premium analysis.

Not counted in the number

  • The baseline type: not among the facts read
  • The oldest vintage still on sale, the content of the safeguards and the verifier's quality: not among the facts read

Analysed on 17 Oct 2026

evidence: 14/14 registry documents read

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

How this analysis was made

Standard
American Carbon Registry (ACR)
Methodology
ACR IFM (Industrially Managed Forests) How our current method reads projects of this type
Our method
CarbonMeld methodology v3 · documents read on 17 Oct 2026 · 14/14 registry documents read

Analysis

Anew - Elk Forestry Project (KENTUCKY, US) improves forest management to increase carbon stocks (ACR IFM) (Improved Forest Management on mixed hardwood forest (cove and oak-hickory, yellow poplar, chestnut oak)) under ACR IFM (Industrially Managed Forests); registry status Registered (ACR), 632,438 credits issued (vintages 2019–2024). The documents name TÜV SÜD America, Inc. – Ruby Canyon as validation / verification body. Project area: 14,230 acres. The latest verification report (03/01/2022 – 02/29/2024) verifies 242,241 tCO2e.

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    Pilot phase only (2021–2023)

    Eligible only for the pilot phase: not usable for the current 2024–2026 phase.

    Source: registry label · read on 12 Nov 2026

    Covers: credits of this project that carry the label on the registry — not every unit or lot

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    CCP-labelled credits

    The registry marks credits of this project with the Integrity Council's Core Carbon Principles label: check that the units offered carry it.

    Source: registry label · read on 12 Nov 2026

    Covers: credits of this project that carry the label on the registry — not every unit or lot

  • Removal or reduction

    Carbon removal

    Takes CO₂ out of the atmosphere — the only type that can neutralise residual emissions in an SBTi net-zero claim.

    Source: registry label · read on 12 Nov 2026

    Covers: the project type, not a label on individual credits

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label · read on 12 Nov 2026

    Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2019
30,868130,867
2020
152,66916,618136,051
2021
177,1656,656170,509
2022
162,84696162,750
2023
95,254095,254
2024
13,636013,636
Total632,43823,371609,067

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records. (+40)

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at listings@carbonmeld.com.

⚑ Contest this rating

Profile & governance

Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System·Carbon credit ratings explained·Carbon credit due diligence checklist

Are you the project owner?

Full analysis (free for owners)

Owners get free access to the full analysis of their own project: every rule that raised or lowered the number, with the fact and the source it rests on, the negative facts' detail and the documents read. Write to us from your organisation's email address.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the rating.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →

Cite this page

CarbonMeld (2026). Anew - Elk Forestry Project (ACR-595): CarbonMeld document-based rating, methodology v3, documents read on 17 Oct 2026. https://carbonmeld.com/projects/anew-elk-forestry-project/.

The citation names the rating by its methodology version and the day the documents were read.

Unlock the full analysis

The dimension values of the rating, every rule that raised or lowered the number with the fact and the source it rests on, the negative facts' detail and quotes, and 14 registry documents (14 read).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and the dimension values in side-by-side comparisons, when every rated project is on the same version of our methodology (public-data comparison, the negative facts included, is free; fair use: 30 projects per day, or 300 with Pro at €49 + VAT per month). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Enter your email to pay with crypto

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Similar projects

Same methodology or sector, the same registry first.