Skip to main content
ACRForest CarbonMICHIGAN, USGeneral Methodologyv2.0

Anew - Gray Wolf Forestry Project

ACR-858 ↗

#39of 69 in REDD+#65of 115 in United States#13of 45 in American Carbon Registry (ACR)

2.9/ 10
Integrity
2.0
Transparency
3.0
Claim Safety
3.0
Documentation
4.5

Audit Analysis

The project demonstrates a clean compliance record with no material findings or corrective actions noted, but suffers from severe evidence gaps across all core quality dimensions. Critical verification data, including additionality testing, baseline methodology, and buffer pool contributions, are entirely absent from the available records. Substantive documentation is required before credit quality can be reliably established.

Red Flags

  • Additionality assessment and independent verifier details completely missing
  • Baseline reassessment timing and leakage treatment not documented
  • CORSIA and CCP eligibility status unconfirmed, leaving double-claiming risk unresolved
  • Leakage not addressed in project documentation
  • Buffer pool size not disclosed in available documents

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

No assessment found

Permanence

Buffer pool unaddressed

Leakage

Leakage not addressed

Baseline

Method not stated

Safeguards

None documented

Double-claim

Status unconfirmed

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-06General Methodology v2.0

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents