Anshan Iron and Steel Group Corporation (Anshan) Blast Furnace Gas Combined Cycle Power Plant Project
#182of 204 in China#194of 213 in CDM (UNFCCC)#17of 17 in ACM0004
Audit Analysis
This CDM blast-furnace-gas combined-cycle power plant project in China has a verified investment-test additionality and a reasonable zero-leakage position for an energy-efficiency project, but is severely undermined by eight material findings, fifteen required corrective actions, and a CDM-EB rejection of CER issuance for a prior period. Multiple inconsistencies between the PDD, validation report, and monitoring report — including conflicting baseline methods, crediting-period dates, and leakage justifications — erode confidence in the underlying data. The project's claim safety is further weakened by the absence of verified ERR figures for the monitoring period and a grid emission factor drawn from 2004 data.
Red Flags
- CDM-EB rejected the request for issuance of CERs for the period 1 March 2010 to 30 September 2010, indicating a material compliance failure during the crediting period
- Eight material findings identified in the verification process, including missing monitoring of auxiliary fuel volume, metering arrangements differing from the registered PDD, and missing discussion of existing coal-fired captive power plants as baseline alternatives
- Fifteen corrective actions were required, spanning monitoring gaps, calculation errors, technical description mismatches, and baseline-section omissions
- Grid emission factor of 1.0027 tCO₂/MWh is drawn from 2004 data, raising questions about its continued representativeness for the 2010–2011 monitoring period
- Total verified ERR for the monitoring period is not stated in the extracted record, preventing independent verification of delivery against the pro-rata expectation
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 1,895,073 | 0 | 1,895,073 | |
| Total | 1,895,073 | 0 | 1,895,073 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed investment test
EE project, no buffer pool recorded
0% deduction, justification contradictory across docs
Method contradictory; grid EF from 2004
Safeguards and benefit sharing mentioned; no FPIC or grievan
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →