Anshan Iron and Steel Group Corporation (Anshan) Coke Dry Quenching Power Generation Project
#116of 204 in China#94of 213 in CDM (UNFCCC)#10of 17 in ACM0004
Audit Analysis
A CDM coke dry quenching power generation project in China with a VVB-confirmed combined additionality test, but undermined by five material findings (including PDD inconsistencies and IRR calculation errors), a 77% discrepancy in claimed emission reductions between successive monitoring reports, and contradictory baseline and leakage characterisations across documents. The project lacks a buffer pool, uses an outdated 2006 grid emission factor, and provides no verified ERR figure for the monitoring period.
Red Flags
- Claimed total emission reductions dropped from 38,696 tCO₂e (2010 monitoring report) to 21,782 tCO₂e (2011 monitoring report) — a 44% downward revision that signals initial over-crediting
- Five material findings in the verification record, including PDD inconsistencies in net power supply and annual emission reduction, project emissions from CDQ start-up initially omitted, and IRR/common-practice analysis requiring revision
- Baseline method is contradictory: the validation report (2009) describes a jurisdictional baseline while the monitoring report (2010) describes a project-specific baseline
- Leakage justification is inconsistent: the validation report deems leakage negligible while the monitoring report states it was quantified, yet the deduction is 0% in both cases
- Grid emission factor of 1.0027 tCO₂/MWh is drawn from 2006 data, making it potentially stale for a project operating through 2019
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 12,259 | 0 | 12,259 | |
| 2011 | 38,696 | 0 | 38,696 | |
| Total | 50,955 | 0 | 50,955 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed but IRR and common-practice findings unresolve
No buffer pool stated; EE project with low inherent reversal
0% deduction with contradictory justification across documen
Project-specific baseline; method contradicts validation rep
Safeguards mentioned and benefit-sharing described, but FPIC
CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →