Skip to main content
CDMEE own generationChinaACM0004

Anshan Iron and Steel Group Corporation (Anshan) Coke Dry Quenching Power Generation Project

CDM-1670 ↗

#116of 204 in China#94of 213 in CDM (UNFCCC)#10of 17 in ACM0004

5.1/ 10
Integrity
5.0
Transparency
5.5
Claim Safety
4.5
Documentation
5.5

Audit Analysis

A CDM coke dry quenching power generation project in China with a VVB-confirmed combined additionality test, but undermined by five material findings (including PDD inconsistencies and IRR calculation errors), a 77% discrepancy in claimed emission reductions between successive monitoring reports, and contradictory baseline and leakage characterisations across documents. The project lacks a buffer pool, uses an outdated 2006 grid emission factor, and provides no verified ERR figure for the monitoring period.

Red Flags

  • Claimed total emission reductions dropped from 38,696 tCO₂e (2010 monitoring report) to 21,782 tCO₂e (2011 monitoring report) — a 44% downward revision that signals initial over-crediting
  • Five material findings in the verification record, including PDD inconsistencies in net power supply and annual emission reduction, project emissions from CDQ start-up initially omitted, and IRR/common-practice analysis requiring revision
  • Baseline method is contradictory: the validation report (2009) describes a jurisdictional baseline while the monitoring report (2010) describes a project-specific baseline
  • Leakage justification is inconsistent: the validation report deems leakage negligible while the monitoring report states it was quantified, yet the deduction is 0% in both cases
  • Grid emission factor of 1.0027 tCO₂/MWh is drawn from 2006 data, making it potentially stale for a project operating through 2019

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2009
12,259012,259
2011
38,696038,696
Total50,955050,955

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed but IRR and common-practice findings unresolve

Permanence

No buffer pool stated; EE project with low inherent reversal

Leakage

0% deduction with contradictory justification across documen

Baseline

Project-specific baseline; method contradicts validation rep

Safeguards

Safeguards mentioned and benefit-sharing described, but FPIC

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-25ACM0004

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents