AWMS Methane Recovery Project BR06-S-26, Minas Gerais, Brazil
#19of 104 in Brazil#55of 213 in CDM (UNFCCC)#10of 62 in AMS-III.D
Audit Analysis
A CDM methane-recovery project from Brazilian animal waste management with VVB-confirmed additionality and no reversal events, but hampered by a significant under-delivery (roughly 45% of pro-rata expectation), contradictory leakage treatment across documents, and a project-specific modeled baseline with no reassessment data. The project is conservative in its actual credit delivery, reducing over-crediting risk, but the documentation record is limited to the first two years of a ten-year crediting period.
Red Flags
- Verified ERR figure is not stated in any available document; only the claimed 13,035 tCO₂e for the 2008–2010 monitoring period is available, making independent verification of actual delivery impossible from the extracted record.
- Leakage treatment is contradictory: the monitoring report (2010) records leakage as 'not addressed' while the validation report (2011) states it was 'deemed negligible' — the inconsistency undermines confidence in the leakage assessment.
- The project delivered only ~45% of the pro-rata expectation for the elapsed monitoring period (13,035 vs ~28,900 tCO₂e expected), suggesting operational or baseline-accuracy issues that were not fully resolved.
- Baseline data for Fazenda Ponte Alta I and II in the PDD did not match on-site data and had to be corrected to more conservative values, indicating initial baseline inaccuracy.
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 13,029 | 0 | 13,029 | |
| Total | 13,029 | 0 | 13,029 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed combined test
Avoidance type, no reversals, buffer not stated
Contradictory treatment across documents
Project-specific, modeled, no reassessment data
Mentioned but FPIC and grievance not detailed
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →