Skip to main content
CDMMethane avoidanceBrazilAMS-III.D

BRASCARBON Methane Recovery Project BCA-BRA-09.

CDM-5492 ↗

#65of 104 in Brazil#163of 213 in CDM (UNFCCC)#37of 62 in AMS-III.D

4.5/ 10
Integrity
4.8
Transparency
4.5
Claim Safety
4.2
Documentation
4.5

Audit Analysis

A CDM methane recovery project in Brazil with a combined additionality test and project-specific modeled baseline, but undermined by a seven-fold discrepancy between the PDD and validation report on total emissions reductions, contradictory leakage treatment across documents, and twelve material findings including calculation errors and incorrect methodology references. The project avoids inherent reversal risk (methane destruction), yet the volume of documentation defects and missing verification data significantly erodes confidence in the claimed credits.

Red Flags

  • Total ERR discrepancy of ~7× between the PDD (51,191 tCO₂e) and the validation report (358,337 tCO₂e) raises serious over-crediting risk
  • Twelve material findings (CL 1–CL 12) and one corrective action (CAR 1) in the monitoring report, including calculation errors in tables B2, B6, B.6.3, B.7 and incorrect parameters WCH4,y and FCH4,m
  • Leakage treatment is contradictory: the monitoring report states leakage was not addressed, while the validation report indicates it was quantified; the 0% deduction lacks a clear, consistent justification
  • Farm locations in the monitoring report did not correspond to the registered project (SPCarbono 09), casting doubt on the representativeness of the monitored data
  • Outdated methodology version (AMS-III.H) and Tool 06 version referenced in the monitoring report, indicating the project may not be applying the current methodological requirements

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2017
192,7420192,742
2018
47,918047,918
2019
48,060048,060
2020
38,958038,958
2021
51,606051,606
Total379,2840379,284

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Combined test applied but VVB confirmation not explicitly st

Permanence

Methane avoidance — no inherent reversal risk; no reversal e

Leakage

0% deduction with contradictory justification across monitor

Baseline

Project-specific modeled baseline, reassessed 2020; less rob

Safeguards

Safeguards and benefit sharing mentioned; FPIC and grievance

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-25AMS-III.D

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents