BRASCARBON Methane Recovery Project BCA-BRA-09.
#65of 104 in Brazil#163of 213 in CDM (UNFCCC)#37of 62 in AMS-III.D
Audit Analysis
A CDM methane recovery project in Brazil with a combined additionality test and project-specific modeled baseline, but undermined by a seven-fold discrepancy between the PDD and validation report on total emissions reductions, contradictory leakage treatment across documents, and twelve material findings including calculation errors and incorrect methodology references. The project avoids inherent reversal risk (methane destruction), yet the volume of documentation defects and missing verification data significantly erodes confidence in the claimed credits.
Red Flags
- Total ERR discrepancy of ~7× between the PDD (51,191 tCO₂e) and the validation report (358,337 tCO₂e) raises serious over-crediting risk
- Twelve material findings (CL 1–CL 12) and one corrective action (CAR 1) in the monitoring report, including calculation errors in tables B2, B6, B.6.3, B.7 and incorrect parameters WCH4,y and FCH4,m
- Leakage treatment is contradictory: the monitoring report states leakage was not addressed, while the validation report indicates it was quantified; the 0% deduction lacks a clear, consistent justification
- Farm locations in the monitoring report did not correspond to the registered project (SPCarbono 09), casting doubt on the representativeness of the monitored data
- Outdated methodology version (AMS-III.H) and Tool 06 version referenced in the monitoring report, indicating the project may not be applying the current methodological requirements
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 192,742 | 0 | 192,742 | |
| 2018 | 47,918 | 0 | 47,918 | |
| 2019 | 48,060 | 0 | 48,060 | |
| 2020 | 38,958 | 0 | 38,958 | |
| 2021 | 51,606 | 0 | 51,606 | |
| Total | 379,284 | 0 | 379,284 |
Risk Indicators
Combined test applied but VVB confirmation not explicitly st
Methane avoidance — no inherent reversal risk; no reversal e
0% deduction with contradictory justification across monitor
Project-specific modeled baseline, reassessed 2020; less rob
Safeguards and benefit sharing mentioned; FPIC and grievance
CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →