Skip to main content
CDMHydroChinaACM0002

Baishuiquan Hydropower Project, Guizhou Province, China

CDM-2104 ↗

#748of 1935 in Renewable energy#368of 1084 in China#520of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#581of 1287 in ACM0002

5.4/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
5.0
Claim Safety
6.0
Documentation
5.0

Audit Analysis

The Baishuiquan small hydropower project (CDM-2104) is a straightforward grid-displacement project with a jurisdictional baseline and a combined additionality test, but the extracted record shows gaps in VVB-confirmed additionality, missing verified ERR figures, and contradictory characterisations of the baseline method and leakage treatment across documents. The project appears to be delivering well above its pro-rata ex-ante expectation, reducing over-crediting risk, yet the absence of CORSIA/CCP status and incomplete monitoring parameters temper confidence.

Red Flags

  • Additionality test type is recorded as 'combined' but VVB confirmation of the additionality assessment is not found in the extracted record, leaving the robustness of the additionality claim unverified.
  • The monitoring report (2017) characterises the baseline as 'project' while the validation report (2016) states 'jurisdictional'; this contradiction undermines confidence in the baseline methodology as applied during monitoring.
  • Leakage justification is inconsistent: the validation report (2016) deems leakage negligible, but the monitoring report (2017) records it as 'not addressed', creating an ambiguity in the project's leakage treatment.
  • Corrective actions were required to add monitoring parameters (EGPJ, falicity, CapPJ) to the PDD, indicating the original documentation was incomplete at validation.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2011
32,367032,367
2012
63,290063,290
2013
58,412058,412
2015
89,477089,477
2017
70,546070,546
Total314,0920314,092

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Combined test present but VVB confirmation not found in reco

Permanence

Avoidance project; no reversal events reported

Leakage

0% deduction; justification inconsistent across documents

Baseline

Jurisdictional per validation report; contradicted by monito

Safeguards

Safeguards and benefit-sharing mentioned; FPIC and grievance

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-25ACM0002

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents