Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
EN
Re-assessment pendingGSWindTurkeyRegistry: RegisteredACM0002

Bandirma-3 WPP

Developer: SEKANS ENERJI LIMITED ŞİRKETİ

GS-1146 ↗ · current registry ID: GS683

#248of 431 in Türkiye#710of 2172 in Gold Standard (GS)#1751of 3484 in ACM0002

Score from methodology v2.1 (analysis of 1 Sep 2026). Re-assessment under v2.2 pending.

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 5.5 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Re-assessment pending · v2.1

Analysis

Bandirma-3 WPP is a Gold Standard wind project with a solid jurisdictional baseline and VVB-confirmed additionality, but its integrity is undermined by an extensive list of data-quality errors, an unapproved capacity increase included in credit calculations, and two unresolved findings (grievance mechanism implementation and agricultural land concerns). The project over-delivered relative to its pro-rata expectation in the 2023 monitoring period, reducing over-crediting risk, yet the sheer volume of corrective actions across multiple verification cycles signals systemic MRV weaknesses.

Red Flags

5 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

On this page: the analysis of 1 Sep 2026, marked “Re-assessment pending”. Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, 5 red flags, score factors, detailed analysis, and 32 registry documents (27 analyzed).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology not approved by ICVCMACM0002

    The Integrity Council assessed this methodology as not meeting the Core Carbon Principles.

    Source: ICVCM assessment

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: registry label

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-10-04

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2010
28,69528,6950
2011
46,07046,0700
2012
41,37441,3740
2013
37,49537,301194
2014
31,94131,303638
2015
40,38732,7747,613
2016
42,92842,070858
2017
8,9668,9660
2018
19,27519,2750
2019
69,06460,3348,730
2020
77,11132,07045,041
2021
71,262071,262
2022
73,145073,145
2023
70,085070,085
2024
68,190068,190
2025
49,346049,346
Total775,334380,232395,102

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2010–2011ACM0002the documents for this period state different versions (v9.0, v92.0)

    monitoring report + verification report

  2. 2011–2013ACM0002 v9.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  3. 2013–2017ACM0002 v9.0since replaced by v22.0

    verification report

    official page · verified on

  4. 2018–2020ACM0002 v18.1since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  5. 2018–2022ACM0002 v18.1since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  6. 2020–2022ACM0002 v18.1since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  • ACM0002: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records.

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceACM0002

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →