Skip to main content
CDMBiomass EnergyArgentinaAMS-I.D

Bio energy in General Deheza –Electricity generation based on peanut hull and sunflower husk

CDM-0950 ↗

#71of 196 in Biomass#4of 6 in Argentina#138of 213 in CDM (UNFCCC)#133of 417 in AMS-I.D

4.8/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
4.5
Claim Safety
4.0
Documentation
5.0

Audit Analysis

A CDM biomass energy project in Argentina with a confirmed additionality test and a recently reassessed jurisdictional baseline, but undermined by a severe seven-fold discrepancy in claimed emissions reductions between the PDD and the validation report, a contradictory leakage justification, and two unresolved corrective actions related to biomass surplus calculations and missing calorific value data. Feedstock sustainability and FPIC are absent, raising concerns about the robustness of the project's environmental and social claims.

Red Flags

  • Total ERR differs by a factor of seven between the PDD (73,531 tCO2e) and the validation report (10,504 tCO2e), creating serious uncertainty about the true credit volume
  • Leakage justification is contradictory: the monitoring report states it was 'quantified' while the validation report (more recent) states it was 'deemed negligible', and CAR 01 confirms the biomass surplus calculation was inaccurate per TOOL22
  • Net Calorific Value (NCV) data for the biomass feedstocks was not provided to the validation team (CAR 02), undermining the accuracy of all emission calculations
  • Feedstock sustainability assessment is entirely absent from the extracted record for a project burning peanut hull and sunflower husk
  • FPIC was not conducted and no grievance mechanism is documented, despite safeguards being mentioned

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2011
25,087025,087
2012
15,746015,746
2016
103,5110103,511
Total144,3440144,344

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test

Permanence

Avoidance project, no reversal data, no buffer pool

Leakage

0% deduction, contradictory justification, calc error flagge

Baseline

Jurisdictional, reassessed 2022

Safeguards

Safeguards mentioned, benefit sharing described, but no FPIC

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-26AMS-I.D

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents