Bio energy in General Deheza Electricity generation based on peanut hull and sunflower husk
#71of 196 in Biomass#4of 6 in Argentina#138of 213 in CDM (UNFCCC)#133of 417 in AMS-I.D
Audit Analysis
A CDM biomass energy project in Argentina with a confirmed additionality test and a recently reassessed jurisdictional baseline, but undermined by a severe seven-fold discrepancy in claimed emissions reductions between the PDD and the validation report, a contradictory leakage justification, and two unresolved corrective actions related to biomass surplus calculations and missing calorific value data. Feedstock sustainability and FPIC are absent, raising concerns about the robustness of the project's environmental and social claims.
Red Flags
- Total ERR differs by a factor of seven between the PDD (73,531 tCO2e) and the validation report (10,504 tCO2e), creating serious uncertainty about the true credit volume
- Leakage justification is contradictory: the monitoring report states it was 'quantified' while the validation report (more recent) states it was 'deemed negligible', and CAR 01 confirms the biomass surplus calculation was inaccurate per TOOL22
- Net Calorific Value (NCV) data for the biomass feedstocks was not provided to the validation team (CAR 02), undermining the accuracy of all emission calculations
- Feedstock sustainability assessment is entirely absent from the extracted record for a project burning peanut hull and sunflower husk
- FPIC was not conducted and no grievance mechanism is documented, despite safeguards being mentioned
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 25,087 | 0 | 25,087 | |
| 2012 | 15,746 | 0 | 15,746 | |
| 2016 | 103,511 | 0 | 103,511 | |
| Total | 144,344 | 0 | 144,344 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed combined test
Avoidance project, no reversal data, no buffer pool
0% deduction, contradictory justification, calc error flagge
Jurisdictional, reassessed 2022
Safeguards mentioned, benefit sharing described, but no FPIC
CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →