Skip to main content
CDMBiomass EnergyIndiaAMS-I.D

Biomass based power generation plant at village Channu, Punjab

CDM-4488 ↗

#111of 352 in Biomass#587of 975 in India#867of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#367of 806 in AMS-I.D

4.9/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
4.5
Claim Safety
4.0
Documentation
5.5

Audit Analysis

A CDM biomass power project in Punjab, India with a VVB-confirmed investment additionality test and jurisdictional grid baseline, but undermined by a significant ERR figure discrepancy within the same monitoring report, a 0% leakage deduction that conflicts with a corrective action on feedstock sourcing, and a grid emission factor frozen at 2009 values. The project lacks a buffer pool, feedstock sustainability assessment, and verified ERR figures, leaving material gaps in both integrity and claim safety.

Red Flags

  • ERR contradiction within the same monitoring report (2022-01-13): 90,888 vs 217,876 tCO₂e — a 2.4× discrepancy with no stated basis for the difference, creating serious over-crediting ambiguity
  • Leakage deduction of 0% ('deemed negligible') while the verification team raised a corrective action specifically to verify mustard stalk sourcing from Hanumangarh and Sirsa to avoid leakage — the two positions are internally inconsistent
  • Grid emission factor of 0.84 tCO₂/MWh is anchored to 2009 data; India's grid has become cleaner since, meaning the baseline may overstate actual reductions
  • 12 Corrective Action Requests and 8 Clarification Requests were raised and closed during verification, indicating substantial documentation and monitoring quality issues
  • Feedstock sustainability is not assessed in any available document, leaving open the risk that biomass sourcing displaces agricultural residues or causes indirect land-use change

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed investment test

Permanence

no reversal events but no permanence mechani

Leakage

0% deduction conflicts with sourcing corrective action

Baseline

Jurisdictional grid EF but anchored to 2009 data

Safeguards

Safeguards and benefit sharing mentioned; FPIC and grievance

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-26AMS-I.D.

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents