Skip to main content
CDMBiomass EnergyIndiaGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Biomass based power plant at Siltara, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.

CDM-0926 ↗

#37of 352 in Biomass#297of 975 in India#405of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)

5.6/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
5.0
Claim Safety
6.0
Documentation
6.5

Audit Analysis

A CDM biomass power plant in Chhattisgarh, India, with VVB-confirmed additionality and conservative credit delivery (66.5% of pro-rata expectation), but undermined by seven material findings at validation, a contradiction in how leakage was treated, and the absence of FPIC, a grievance mechanism, and independently verified storage data. The project is explicitly excluded from CORSIA, reducing double-claim risk, yet the overall documentation and safeguards picture is incomplete.

Red Flags

  • Seven material findings raised at validation, including a discrepancy in biomass cost used for the investment barrier analysis (1,100 vs 1,200 Rs/Ton), missing N2O and NH3/NOx emission calculations, and an inconsistency in truck-load figures in leakage equations.
  • Contradiction between the monitoring report (leakage 'quantified') and the validation report (leakage 'deemed negligible') creates uncertainty about whether leakage was actually measured or simply assumed away.
  • No FPIC conducted, no grievance mechanism in place, and benefit-sharing not confirmed by the VVB — significant safeguards gaps for a project operating in a rural Indian community.
  • Total verified ERR figure is not stated in the extracted record, preventing independent confirmation of the 48,156 tCO2e claimed in the monitoring report.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2014
46,960046,960
Total46,960046,960

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test

Permanence

mixed evidence / unresolved risk

Leakage

Contradiction: quantified vs deemed negligible

Baseline

Project-specific, grid EF 2005, method contradiction

Safeguards

No FPIC, no grievance mechanism

Double-claim

CORSIA excluded, CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-26General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents