Skip to main content
CDMHydroBrazilGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Braço Norte III Small Hydro Plant

CDM-0667 ↗

#1084of 1935 in Renewable energy#89of 211 in Brazil#813of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)

5.0/ 10
Integrity
5.0
Transparency
5.2
Claim Safety
4.8
Documentation
5.0

Audit Analysis

The Braço Norte III small hydro project is a CDM avoidance project with VVB-confirmed additionality, but it carries significant data-quality concerns: a grid emission factor discrepancy of roughly 18% between the PDD and the monitoring report, a 0% leakage deduction that the monitoring report describes as 'not addressed,' and five corrective action requests raised during verification. Pro-rata delivery is reasonable at about 96% of the expected reduction for the elapsed monitoring period, but the project-specific baseline and unresolved contradictions limit confidence in the claimed figures.

Red Flags

  • Grid emission factor contradiction: the PDD registers 0.5364 tCO2/MWh while the monitoring report uses 0.438 tCO2/MWh, a ~19% gap that could overstate baseline emissions and therefore the project's credited reductions.
  • Leakage deduction is 0% and the monitoring report (June 2012) states leakage was 'not addressed,' even though the earlier validation report (2006) indicated it was quantified — a regression in treatment.
  • Five corrective action requests (CARs) were raised during verification, including failure to invite local communities and the Public Attorney to stakeholder consultation as required by the CDM DNA, and an incorrect crediting-period table in the PDD.
  • Baseline method is contradictory: the validation report (2006) describes a jurisdictional baseline while the verification report (2012) records a project-specific baseline; the more recent verification report is privileged but the inconsistency undermines baseline robustness.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2007
135,2590135,259
2008
66,367066,367
2009
44,549044,549
2012
56,082056,082
Total302,2570302,257

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed investment test

Permanence

Avoidance project, no reversal risk

Leakage

0% deduction, not addressed in monitoring

Baseline

Project-specific, EF contradiction, reassessment not stated

Safeguards

Mentioned but FPIC/grievance not documented; CARs on consult

Double-claim

CCP and CORSIA status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-26General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents