Skip to main content
CDMSolarSouth KoreaAMS-I.D

Bundled Hadong-Busan photovoltaic Power Project of The Korea Southern Power Corporation (1MW Hadong Photovoltaic Power + 0.39MW Busan Photovoltaic Power, Bundling Project)

CDM-3827 ↗

#656of 1935 in Renewable energy#7of 24 in South Korea#448of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#228of 806 in AMS-I.D

5.5/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
6.0
Claim Safety
5.0
Documentation
5.5

Audit Analysis

A small bundled solar PV project in South Korea with a confirmed investment-test additionality and jurisdictional baseline, but undermined by a significant grid emission factor discrepancy between the PDD and validation report, 17 material findings (including NPV calculation errors and meter calibration lapses), and contradictory leakage justifications. The project delivered roughly 84% of its pro-rata expected reductions over the monitored period, which is reasonable, but the data reliability issues cast doubt on the robustness of the underlying claims.

Red Flags

  • Grid emission factor differs by a factor of ~2 between the PDD (0.6417 tCO₂/MWh) and the validation report (1.3 tCO₂/MWh), creating a material over- or under-crediting risk depending on which value is correct
  • 17 material findings in the verification report, including NPV calculation errors, PDD internal inconsistencies (module count and expected GHG reduction mismatch), and meter calibration intervals exceeding the 3-year requirement
  • Leakage justification is contradictory: the validation report (2010) deems leakage negligible while the monitoring report (2017) describes it as quantified, with a 0% deduction in both cases
  • Crediting period differs between the PDD (2009-11-01 to 2019-10-31) and the monitoring report (2010-12-18 to 2020-12-17), creating ambiguity about the actual project lifetime

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2018
5,13505,135
Total5,13505,135

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed investment test

Permanence

Physical PV asset, no reversals reported

Leakage

0% deduction, contradictory justifications across documents

Baseline

Jurisdictional but grid EF contradicts between PDD and valid

Safeguards

Safeguards mentioned, benefit sharing described, but FPIC an

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-26AMS I.D

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents