Bundled Solar Project 1 by Aditya Birla Group of Companies
GS-2035 ↗ · current registry ID: GS7547
#478of 1935 in Renewable energy#247of 975 in India#216of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)#358of 1287 in ACM0002
Audit Analysis
A Gold Standard solar electricity project in India with a VVB-verified investment additionality test and reasonable safeguards, but significant concerns arise from a large discrepancy between the PDD ex-ante estimate and the monitoring-period claim (the project delivered roughly 407% of the pro-rata expectation), a contradiction in baseline method between documents, and the absence of a verified ERR figure. The project is CORSIA-eligible and uses smart-meter monitoring, which are positive signals, but the over-delivery claim and data inconsistencies warrant caution before crediting.
Red Flags
- The monitoring report claims 532,065 tCO₂e for a ~2-year period, while the PDD ex-ante estimate is 326,914 tCO₂e for the full 5-year crediting period — the claim is approximately 407% of the pro-rata expectation, indicating a very large over-delivery that requires independent scrutiny.
- Baseline method is described as 'project-specific' in the verification report but 'jurisdictional' in the monitoring report, creating ambiguity about which baseline was actually applied.
- No verified ERR figure was found in the extracted record; only the claimed figure is available, limiting independent cross-checking.
- Reversal events are marked as 'not addressed' in the verification report, though the more recent monitoring report reports none — the verification report's silence is a documentation gap.
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 5,595 | 5,595 | 0 | |
| 2020 | 194,031 | 194,031 | 0 | |
| 2021 | 99,245 | 98,913 | 332 | |
| Total | 298,871 | 298,539 | 332 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-verified investment test
mixed evidence / unresolved risk
0% deduction with quantified justification, reasonable for local-consumption solar
Project-specific baseline, method contradicts between documents, no reassessment date stated
FPIC conducted, grievance mechanism present, benefit sharing described
CORSIA-eligible; CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →