Bundled Wind Power project in Koppal Karnataka
#1410of 1935 in Renewable energy#765of 975 in India#990of 1339 in Verra (VCS)#1082of 1287 in ACM0002
Audit Analysis
A registered VCS wind power project in Karnataka with VVB-confirmed additionality and no CORSIA eligibility, but undermined by extensive data-quality issues (generation figures mismatching invoices across nine turbines), seven material findings including a 23.1% under-delivery, and eight cross-document contradictions. The project is inherently low-risk on permanence (avoidance-type wind), yet the volume of corrective actions and inconsistent reporting significantly erode confidence in the integrity and transparency of the credit claims.
Red Flags
- Actual emission reductions are 23.10% lower than estimated due to non-commissioning of 27.3 MW and breakdowns, as noted in the 2024 verification report material findings
- Net generation values for multiple turbines (KST-147, KST-177, KST-101, KST-230, KST-51, KST-67, KST-71, KST-130, KST-131) do not match JMR or invoice records across numerous months, as flagged in the 2024 verification report corrective actions
- The 2024 verification report lists an error of 'incorrect project type (solar vs wind)', raising questions about the accuracy of the project description and associated calculations
- Eight contradictions exist across documents, including baseline method (project-specific vs jurisdictional), additionality test type (investment vs combined), and grievance mechanism presence (true vs false between two verification reports)
- FPIC was not conducted, and the 2023 verification report did not mention safeguards, while the 2024 report does — an inconsistency in safeguards documentation
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 215,723 | 0 | 215,723 | |
| 2019 | 292,572 | 108,295 | 184,277 | |
| 2020 | 265,868 | 207,738 | 58,130 | |
| 2021 | 274,843 | 0 | 274,843 | |
| 2022 | 240,536 | 0 | 240,536 | |
| Total | 1,289,542 | 316,033 | 973,509 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed but test-type contradiction (investment vs combined)
Avoidance-type wind; no reversal risk or events reported
0% deduction with 'not applicable' justification; reasonable for wind
Project-specific baseline; contradiction with MR calling it jurisdictional
Grievance mechanism present (2024 VR); FPIC not conducted; 2023 VR silent
CORSIA explicitly excluded; CCP status not stated in available documents
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →