Skip to main content
PURremovalSwedenGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Bussme-01-Svedala

PUR-665890 ↗

#75of 352 in Biomass#3of 5 in Sweden#23of 111 in Puro.earth (PUR)

5.2/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
5.0
Claim Safety
5.0
Documentation
5.5

Audit Analysis

The Bussme-01-Svedala biochar removal project in Sweden is verified by DNV under the Puro Biochar Methodology (Edition 2022 V3) with a VVB-confirmed investment-test additionality and a 2.5% buffer pool. However, the verification report identified material findings including a 7% impact on CORCs from a production-versus-shipped-volume discrepancy, and no leakage deduction or justification is documented. The project-specific baseline, absence of FNRB and usage-rate data, and a permanence-claim contradiction (100 vs 1,000 years) introduce moderate uncertainty.

Red Flags

  • Material finding: 7% impact on CORCs due to discrepancy between reported production and shipped volumes at the Svedala site (corrected by Bussme but indicates MRV weakness)
  • No leakage deduction or leakage justification found in any available document for a biochar removal project where displaced soil carbon or feedstock sourcing leakage is plausible
  • Permanence claim contradiction: 100 years in the 2023 verification report vs 1,000 years in the 2021 issuance document — the crediting-period basis is unclear
  • Project-specific baseline with no documented reassessment date; baseline robustness depends entirely on the initial PDD assumptions

Credit Vintages Exhausted

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2021
9079070
2022
9399390
2023
2812810
2025
2052050
Total2,3322,3320

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed investment test

Permanence

claim inconsistent (100 vs 1,000 yr)

Leakage

No deduction or justification documented

Baseline

Project-specific; no reassessment date

Safeguards

Safeguards mentioned; FPIC and grievance mechanism not stated

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

Marketplaces

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-03General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents