Cakirlar Run-off-River Hydro Power Plant
Score Breakdown
Integrity
verified Additionality was confirmed by the VVB using an investment test in the verification report.
missing The verification report records 15 CARs and 9 CLs, and 12 corrective actions are still required, which weakens confidence in the project controls.
Transparency
missing The monitoring period is stated, but public-facing issuance and usage details are incomplete because verified totals and usage monitoring method are not found in the extracted record.
inferred Low extraction confidence and many unresolved corrective actions reduce confidence that the documentation set is complete and easy to audit.
Claim Safety
verified The project uses a project baseline and the latest verification report says leakage is deemed negligible with a 0% deduction.
missing Core claim-safety fields are missing, including CORSIA eligibility, CCP status, and any verified usage rate, leaving residual over-claim risk.
Documentation
verified The record includes a named VVB, a monitoring period, a crediting period, and multiple official documents were used.
missing Low extraction confidence plus numerous CARs and CLs indicate the documentation set is difficult to rely on without further review.
Detailed Analysis
Integrity
The verification report confirms additionality through an investment test and names RINA Services S.p.A. as the VVB, which supports the project’s core integrity case. However, the same report lists 15 CARs and 9 CLs, and 12 corrective actions are still required, which suggests material implementation or documentation weaknesses. Reversal risk is not well managed in the extracted record because reversal events are marked as not addressed and no buffer pool percentage is found.
Transparency
The monitoring period is clearly stated, and the project has an identifiable registry and VVB, which helps traceability. That said, key transparency fields are missing from the extracted record, including the total verified issuance, the usage monitoring method, and any FNRB or usage-rate evidence. Low extraction confidence further reduces confidence that the available documentation fully captures the public record.
Claim Safety
Claim safety is moderate at best because the latest verification report says leakage is deemed negligible and applies a 0% deduction, but the supporting justification is not deeply evidenced in the extracted facts. The baseline is project-specific rather than jurisdictional or recently reassessed, and several market-claim controls are not stated, including CORSIA eligibility and CCP status. The contradiction on leakage is resolved in favor of the latest verification report, but the earlier quantified treatment means the record is not fully consistent.
Documentation
The file set appears reasonably broad, with a verification report, a stated monitoring period, a crediting period, and a named VVB. However, the extraction confidence is low, and the record contains many unresolved CARs and CLs, which indicates the documentation is not cleanly complete. The crediting-period contradiction is resolved in favor of the newer verification report dated 2025-02-18, but the older period in earlier documents shows that the project history is not straightforward.
Audit Analysis
The project has some positive integrity signals, including VVB-confirmed additionality and a stated leakage treatment, but the evidence base is weakened by many corrective actions, missing key MRV fields, and low extraction confidence. Overall claim safety is only moderate because the baseline is project-specific, leakage is treated as negligible rather than robustly quantified in the latest record, and several core eligibility fields are not stated.
Project Description
Developer: Anadolu Elektrik Uretim ve Tic. A.S. Type: Small, Low - Impact Hydro Size: Small Scale Methodology: ACM0002 Grid-connected electricity generation from renewable sources Crediting period: 2013-03-01 → 2027-02-28 Estimated annual credits: 27610 tCO2e SDGs: Goal 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth, Goal 7: Affordable and Clean Energy, Goal 13: Climate Action
Red Flags
- The verification report lists 15 CARs and 9 CLs, with 12 corrective actions still required, which raises reliability concerns.
- Key MRV and market-claim fields are missing or not stated, including public usage monitoring details, total verified issuance, and CORSIA/CCP status.
Credit Vintages Exhausted
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 27,050 | 27,050 | 0 | |
| 2014 | 28,111 | 28,111 | 0 | |
| 2015 | 26,426 | 26,426 | 0 | |
| 2016 | 14,077 | 14,077 | 0 | |
| Total | 95,664 | 95,664 | 0 |
Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio
- Publish a complete issuance and usage trail, including verified totals, usage monitoring method, and any retirement or transfer evidence.
- Resolve the outstanding CARs and CLs and provide a clearer, fully documented explanation for leakage, reversal risk, and baseline treatment.
Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed investment test
reversal risk not addressed
0% deduction with limited support
project baseline, reassessment not stated
FPIC and grievance mechanism present
CORSIA/CCP status not stated
Where to buy
+ Know where to buy this?
Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].
⚑ Dispute this rating
Sei il proprietario di questo progetto?
Correzione metadati (gratuita)
Nome, paese, marketplace o link errati? Segnalacelo.
Non modifica lo score.
[email protected] →Rivalutazione con nuovi documenti
Hai documentazione aggiornata non ancora inclusa? Puoi richiedere un nuovo run della pipeline con i nuovi input.
Invia Documenti →