Cangxi Donghe Beituo Hydropower Station
#1514of 1935 in Renewable energy#955of 1084 in China#1284of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#511of 806 in AMS-I.D
Audit Analysis
A small-scale CDM hydropower project in China using the standardized AMS-I.D. methodology, with a jurisdictional grid baseline and no reversal risk inherent to the technology. However, the available record is thin: no monitoring report or verified emissions reductions were found, the extraction confidence is low, and a material finding (CAR-1) was raised over the baseline scenario description. A contradiction in the leakage justification between the PDD and another document further weakens confidence in the project's data integrity.
Red Flags
- Contradiction in leakage treatment: the PDD (2017-03-07) states leakage is 'deemed negligible' while another document describes it as 'quantified' — the basis for the 0% deduction is inconsistent across documents.
- No monitoring report or verified emissions reductions found in the extracted record; the 120,449 tCO2e lifetime claim cannot be independently corroborated.
- Material finding CAR-1 was raised at validation regarding incomplete description of the baseline scenario in PDD Section A.1, indicating the initial documentation did not fully meet CDM form requirements.
- Additionality test type and VVB confirmation are not stated in the available documents, leaving the additionality claim unverified in the extracted record.
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 13,580 | 0 | 13,580 | |
| Total | 13,580 | 0 | 13,580 |
Risk Indicators
Test type not stated; VVB confirmation not found in record
Avoidance project; no reversal risk or events
0% deduction; justification contradicts across documents
Jurisdictional grid EF; reassessed 2017
Safeguards and benefit sharing mentioned; FPIC and grievance
CORSIA and CCP status not stated; dual-channel risk unassess
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →