CGN Inner Mongolia Wuliji Phase II Wind Farm Project
#1412of 1935 in Renewable energy#865of 1084 in China#1145of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#1084of 1287 in ACM0002
Audit Analysis
A CDM wind farm project with a jurisdictional baseline and a minor closed comment, but the extracted record is thin: the additionality test type is not explicitly stated, several MRV fields are absent, and a large discrepancy exists between the PDD (651,560 tCO₂e) and the validation report (93,080 tCO₂e) for total emissions reductions. Low extraction confidence and an unidentified document further limit confidence in the assessment.
Red Flags
- Total ERR differs by a factor of ~7 between the PDD (651,560 tCO₂e, 2019-01-02) and the validation report (93,080 tCO₂e, 2019-01-03); the basis for the lower validated figure is not explained in the extracted record
- Additionality test type and VVB confirmation are not stated in the extracted data, leaving the additionality assessment unverified in this review
- One of the four evidence documents is listed as 'unknown', and minimum extraction confidence is rated low, indicating at least one key document was poorly readable
- Monitoring period, FNRB method, usage monitoring method, and buffer pool percentage are all absent from the extracted record
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 79,737 | 0 | 79,737 | |
| 2020 | 483,958 | 0 | 483,958 | |
| Total | 563,695 | 0 | 563,695 |
Risk Indicators
Test type not stated in extracted record
Avoidance project; no reversal risk
Deemed negligible; appropriate for wind
Jurisdictional; reassessed 2019
Mentioned; FPIC and grievance not detailed
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →