CDMWindChinaACM0002

CGN Inner Mongolia Zhurihe Phase I Wind Farm Project

CDM-1577 ↗

#1502of 1935 in Renewable energy#950of 1084 in China#1261of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#1149of 1287 in ACM0002

4.2/ 10
Integrity
4.5
Transparency
3.5
Claim Safety
5.0
Documentation
3.0

Scored2026-08-27medium confidence

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Audit Analysis

A CDM wind project validated by CTI with a jurisdictional baseline and a reasonable 0% leakage deduction, but the extracted record is thin: additionality details, verified ERR figures, monitoring data, and safeguards information are all absent. The low extraction confidence and a seven-fold discrepancy in claimed ERR between the validation report and an unidentified source limit confidence in the project's data integrity.

Red Flags

  • Additionality test type and VVB confirmation are not stated in any extracted document, leaving a critical CDM requirement unverified in the available record
  • Claimed ERR of 104,190 tCO₂e in the validation report conflicts with a figure of 729,330 from an unidentified source — a 7× discrepancy that cannot be reconciled
  • No verified ERR, monitoring period, or FNRB data found in the extracted record, preventing any delivery-vs-claim assessment
  • Minimum extraction confidence is rated low, indicating at least one key document was poorly readable

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2012
259,2430259,243
2018
268,8020268,802
Total528,0450528,045

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Test not stated in extracted record; VVB validation implies

Permanence

Avoidance project (wind); no reversal risk; no reversal even

Leakage

0% deduction deemed negligible; appropriate for grid-connect

Baseline

Jurisdictional grid EF (0.8405, 2017); reassessed 2019

Safeguards

FPIC, grievance mechanism, and benefit-sharing not stated in

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated; dual-channel risk unassess

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-27ACM0002
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents →