Skip to main content
CDMHydroPeruACM0002

Cheves Hydro Power Project, Peru

CDM-2102 ↗

#1415of 1935 in Renewable energy#16of 24 in Peru#1148of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#1087of 1287 in ACM0002

4.5/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
4.0
Claim Safety
4.0
Documentation
4.0

Audit Analysis

The Cheves Hydro Power Project in Peru is a CDM-registered small hydro scheme validated by DNV with a confirmed combined additionality test, but the available record is heavily constrained by low extraction confidence, the absence of any monitoring-period data, and four material contradictions between the PDD and the validation report — most critically a roughly seven-fold discrepancy in the claimed emission reductions. The project's integrity is further weakened by the lack of documented free, prior and informed consent or a grievance mechanism, which is a significant gap for a hydro project in a region with indigenous communities.

Red Flags

  • The PDD claims 2,756,816 tCO₂e while the validation report records 393,831 tCO₂e — a ~7× discrepancy that is not fully explained by the differing crediting periods (7 vs 21 years), leaving an unexplained ~2.3× gap.
  • No free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) or grievance mechanism is documented in any available record, despite the project being a hydro scheme in Peru where indigenous and local community engagement is a standard safeguard expectation.
  • Baseline method is stated as 'project' in the validation report but 'jurisdictional' in the PDD; for a grid-displacement hydro project the jurisdictional (grid emission factor) approach is the expected method, so the VVB's 'project' label is inconsistent.
  • Minimum extraction confidence is rated low, meaning at least one key document was poorly readable and the full evidentiary picture may be incomplete.

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test

Permanence

Avoidance project

Leakage

0 % deemed negligible; PDD contradiction

Baseline

Method contradiction; 2007 grid EF

Safeguards

Mentioned but no FPIC or grievance mechanism

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-27ACM0002

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents