China Changtanhe Hydropower Project
#486of 1935 in Renewable energy#195of 1084 in China#316of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#363of 1287 in ACM0002
Audit Analysis
The China Changtanhe Hydropower Project is a CDM-registered hydro project with a VVB-confirmed combined additionality test and a jurisdictional grid baseline, but its credibility is undermined by 13 material findings raised during validation, a contradiction in the stated baseline method between the validation and monitoring reports, and an unresolved discrepancy in claimed emission reduction figures across two monitoring reports. The project is a standard avoidance-type hydro credit with low inherent reversal risk, but documentation gaps in verified ERR, monitoring methodology, and safeguards limit confidence.
Red Flags
- 13 material findings (CARs and CRs) raised by TÜV NORD CERT during validation, covering additionality justification, monitoring procedures, meter accuracy, and environmental impact description
- Contradiction in baseline method: validation report (2010) states 'project' baseline while the later monitoring report (2012) states 'jurisdictional' — the basis of the credit calculation is ambiguous
- Claimed ERR differs between two monitoring reports (130,418 in the 2011 report vs 99,335 in the 2012 report) without clear explanation of whether these are cumulative or per-period figures
- Verified ERR figure is not stated in the extracted record, preventing independent cross-check of claimed reductions
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 76,806 | 0 | 76,806 | |
| 2012 | 229,740 | 0 | 229,740 | |
| Total | 306,546 | 0 | 306,546 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed combined test
Avoidance project, no reversal risk
Negligible, justified for hydro
Jurisdictional but method label contradicts validation repor
Mentioned and benefit sharing described, but FPIC and grieva
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →