Skip to main content
CDMWindChinaACM0002

China Resources Weichang Yudaokou Baihuapo 49.5 MW Wind Power Project

CDM-6046 ↗

#1161of 1935 in Renewable energy#672of 1084 in China#883of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#907of 1287 in ACM0002

4.9/ 10
Integrity
6.0
Transparency
3.5
Claim Safety
5.5
Documentation
3.5

Audit Analysis

A 49.5 MW CDM wind project validated by Bureau Veritas with a combined additionality test and jurisdictional grid baseline, but the available record is limited to validation-stage documents with no monitoring reports, no verified emission reductions, and low extraction confidence. The apparent discrepancy in claimed ERR figures between the PDD and validation report is resolved as an annual-versus-lifetime reporting difference (97,708 tCO₂/yr × 7 yr = 683,956 tCO₂), not a true contradiction. Overall the project design is sound for a wind avoidance project, but the absence of post-validation data and the low documentation confidence limit confidence in the credit's integrity.

Red Flags

  • No monitoring report or verified emission reductions found in the extracted record; the project's actual performance over its 2012–2019 crediting period is unconfirmed
  • Low extraction confidence across the document set, meaning key figures may be incomplete or misread
  • Nine material findings at validation (missing IRR tax basis, incomplete common-practice data, unspecified turbine manufacturer/lifetime, missing loan documentation) indicate the PDD had significant gaps that were only partially resolved
  • No buffer pool or permanence mechanism documented, leaving no safety net against potential reversal

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Combined test, VVB-confirmed

Permanence

wind is low-risk but no safety net documente

Leakage

0% deemed negligible, appropriate for wind displacement

Baseline

Jurisdictional grid EF (2010), standard for CDM wind

Safeguards

Safeguards and benefit sharing mentioned; FPIC and grievance

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-27ACM0002

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents