CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index BuyersCORSIA supplyCheck an offerAPI & MCP Method About the System Editorial Policy Score Your Project
EN
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index
← All projects
ScoredICRAvoidance / ReductionZWRegistry: Under validationGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Chirisa REDD+ Project

Developer: Carbon Green Investments

ICR-282 ↗

Under validation

An independent validator is checking the project design, or the registry is reviewing a registration request. The project, or its new phase, is not registered yet.

The vintages below predate the current status. Any offer to sell new credits from this project is a forward commitment on possible future issuance.

International Carbon Registry: “under_validation”

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 5.0 / 10
Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒
Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Scored2026-09-02medium confidenceLatest verified monitoring: 2023-12-31

evidence:1/1registry documents analyzed · 3red flags

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Analysis

The Chirisa REDD+ Project in Zimbabwe presents a structurally sound avoidance design with a jurisdictional baseline, 20% buffer pool, and no reported reversals. However, the evidence base is limited to a single PDD document, with no verification report, monitoring report, or named VVB available, creating significant gaps in independent assurance and transparency. The claimed emissions reductions are broadly consistent with the pro-rata lifetime expectation, but cannot be independently confirmed without a verified figure.

Red Flags

3 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish CORSIA eligibility per project.

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: project sector

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2021
532,9410532,941
2022
864,8340864,834
2023
169,5640169,564
2024
589,7720589,772
2025
589,7720589,772
2026
589,7720589,772
2027
589,7720589,772
2028
589,7720589,772
2029
589,7720589,772
2030
589,7720589,772
2031
589,7720589,772
2032
589,7720589,772
2033
589,7720589,772
2034
589,7720589,772
2035
589,7720589,772
2036
589,7720589,772
2037
589,7720589,772
2038
589,7720589,772
2039
589,7720589,772
2040
589,7720589,772
2041
589,7720589,772
2042
589,7720589,772
2043
589,7720589,772
2044
589,7720589,772
2045
589,7720589,772
2046
589,7720589,772
2047
589,7720589,772
2048
589,7720589,772
2049
589,7720589,772
2050
589,7720589,772
2051
201,9780201,978
Total17,693,161017,693,161

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceGeneral Methodologyv2.1
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →