Consórcio Horizonte Asja

Integrity

The PDD describes additionality through an investment test under ACM0001 Version 11, which supports the project’s core crediting logic. But leakage is recorded as 0% with no real justification, and reversal risk is not addressed, which weakens the permanence and baseline confidence. No material findings or corrective actions were reported in the available PDD, but there is no VVB confirmation in the extracted record.

Transparency

Transparency is limited because the extracted record contains only the PDD and no monitoring report or verification statement. The project names the methodology and crediting period, but the VVB name, monitoring period, and verified issuance totals are not found in available documents. The grid emission factor is stated, yet the broader MRV trail is incomplete.

Claim Safety

Claim safety is weakened by the project-specific baseline and the lack of a documented leakage rationale. The record does not show CORSIA eligibility or CCP approval, and there is no evidence of double registration or double issuance in the extracted facts. Still, the absence of verified monitoring data and the weak leakage treatment increase over-crediting risk.

Documentation

Documentation quality is modest at best: the record relies mainly on a single PDD dated 2012-10-03, with only two evidence documents used in extraction. The extraction confidence is medium, but many important fields are not stated in the available documents, including monitoring details, VVB identity, and verified issuance figures. That leaves substantial uncertainty around how the project performed in practice.

Overall

The project’s main positive is a recognized additionality claim in the PDD, but the evidence base is thin and operational transparency is poor. There are no contradictions listed in the merged facts, so no document hierarchy issue needed to be resolved; however, the absence of verification and monitoring records means the PDD must be treated as the primary source, which is weaker than a verified package. Because documentation is limited and leakage/permanence are not well supported, the overall score remains below average.