Skip to main content
CDMHydroCosta RicaAMS-I.D

Cote small-scale hydropower plant

CDM-0251 ↗

#1519of 1935 in Renewable energy#1291of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#515of 806 in AMS-I.D

4.2/ 10
Integrity
4.2
Transparency
4.5
Claim Safety
4.0
Documentation
3.8

Audit Analysis

A small-scale hydropower project in Costa Rica displacing grid electricity, with a straightforward additionality case but significant data-quality concerns. Eight material findings, nine corrective actions, and eight inter-document contradictions (including a disputed crediting-period start date and a baseline-method discrepancy) undermine confidence in the underlying calculations. The grid emission factor dates from 2008 yet was applied to a 2013–2017 monitoring window, creating a material over-crediting risk that is not offset by any verified ERR figure in the available record.

Red Flags

  • Grid emission factor of 0.2022 tCO₂/MWh is from 2008 but applied to the 2013–2017 monitoring period; Costa Rica's grid mix has shifted materially in that interval, so the displacement benefit is likely overstated.
  • Eight material findings were logged during validation/verification, including an incorrect grid-EF calculation, missing fossil-fuel monitoring parameters, and inconsistent power-meter details, all requiring corrective action.
  • Crediting-period start date is contradictory: the 2018 monitoring report states 2003-04-01 while the 2012 validation report states 2010-04-01, a seven-year discrepancy that affects the pro-rata ERR expectation.
  • Baseline method is described as 'project-specific' in the 2018 monitoring report but 'jurisdictional' in the 2012 PDD, creating ambiguity about which baseline was actually applied.
  • No verified ERR figure was found in any available document, preventing any independent cross-check of the 11,813 tCO₂ claimed.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2011
21,275021,275
2012
25,437025,437
2016
6,27006,270
2019
11,780011,780
Total64,762064,762

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Combined test used but VVB confirmation not confirmed in ext

Permanence

Avoidance project, no reversal risk, no reversal events repo

Leakage

0% deduction reasonable but justification contradicts betwee

Baseline

Method contradiction (project vs jurisdictional); grid EF fr

Safeguards

FPIC, grievance mechanism, and benefit sharing all reported

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-27AMS-I.D.

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents