Dak Mi 4 Hydropower Project, Vietnam
#1416of 1935 in Renewable energy#69of 80 in Vietnam#1149of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#1088of 1287 in ACM0002
Audit Analysis
The Dak Mi 4 Hydropower Project is a small CDM-registered hydro scheme with VVB-confirmed additionality, but its integrity is undermined by seven corrective action requests, contradictory baseline and leakage characterisations across documents, and a 0% leakage deduction whose justification is inconsistent between the validation and monitoring reports. Transparency is limited by the absence of verified ERR figures, FNRB data, and CORSIA/CCP status in the extracted record. Overall, the project presents moderate-to-elevated risk of over-crediting and documentation weakness.
Red Flags
- Seven corrective action requests (CARs) were raised during verification, including missing surface-water permits, an outdated methodology version (11 vs 19), PDD non-compliance with EB 66 Annex 47, an outdated grid emission factor, a monitoring-formula mismatch, an incorrect crediting-period start date, and a stale MOC.
- Leakage justification is contradictory: the 2022 monitoring report states leakage was 'quantified' while the 2019 validation report states it was 'deemed negligible,' yet the applied deduction is 0% in both cases.
- Baseline method is contradictory: the monitoring report describes a project-specific baseline while the validation report references a jurisdictional baseline, creating uncertainty about which baseline underpins the claimed 1,121,202 tCO₂e.
- No buffer pool percentage is stated in any available document, leaving permanence risk unquantified despite the absence of reported reversal events.
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 454,731 | 0 | 454,731 | |
| 2017 | 1,215,728 | 0 | 1,215,728 | |
| Total | 1,670,459 | 0 | 1,670,459 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed combined test
low inherent reversal risk for hydro
0% deduction with contradictory justification across documen
Project-specific baseline; method contradicts validation rep
Safeguards and benefit-sharing mentioned; FPIC and grievance
CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →