Datang Pingyin Phase II Wind Power Project
#760of 1935 in Renewable energy#373of 1084 in China#532of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#588of 1287 in ACM0002
Audit Analysis
A CDM wind power project in China with a jurisdictional baseline and a reasonable 0% leakage deduction, but the extracted record lacks explicit additionality test details, a monitoring report, and several MRV parameters. The ERR discrepancy between the PDD and validation report is explainable as an annual-versus-total reporting difference (78,293 × 7 ≈ 548,051), not a true contradiction. Overall a low-risk project type with moderate documentation gaps.
Red Flags
- Additionality test type and VVB confirmation are not stated in the extracted record; CDM validation requires this, so the gap is likely an extraction issue but cannot be confirmed
- No monitoring report or monitoring period found in the available documents, limiting verification of actual performance against the validated estimate
- CCP and CORSIA eligibility are both unstated, leaving dual-channel or double-claiming risk unassessed
Credit Vintages
No issuances recorded on the registry.
Risk Indicators
Test type not stated in extracted record; CDM validation req
Physical wind assets; no reversal events reported
0% deduction, justified as negligible for grid-displacement
Jurisdictional grid EF (0.8404, 2017); reassessed at validat
Safeguards and benefit-sharing mentioned; FPIC and grievance
CCP and CORSIA eligibility both unstated; dual-channel risk
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →Share this rating
