Skip to main content
CDMBiomass EnergyThailandAMS-I.D

Decha Bio Green Rice Husk Power Generation 7.5MW

CDM-2934 ↗

#9of 352 in Biomass#4of 48 in Thailand#127of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#77of 806 in AMS-I.D

6.3/ 10
Integrity
6.5
Transparency
6.0
Claim Safety
6.5
Documentation
6.0

Audit Analysis

A small-scale CDM biomass energy project (rice husk, 7.5 MW) in Thailand using the simplified AMS-I.D methodology, validated by TÜV NORD CERT. Additionality was confirmed via a barrier test after initial evidence gaps were resolved, and the project delivered approximately 98% of its pro-rata emission reduction expectation in the first monitoring period. Key weaknesses include a thin leakage justification (0% deemed negligible), absent safeguards documentation (no FPIC or grievance mechanism), and several unverified monitoring parameters.

Red Flags

  • Leakage deduction of 0% justified only as 'deemed negligible' without quantified analysis of alternative rice husk uses (e.g., animal feed, soil amendment, other energy applications)
  • No FPIC, grievance mechanism, or feedstock sustainability assessment found in any available document
  • Grid emission factor dated 2007 (0.551 tCO2/MWh) with no evidence of periodic update or sensitivity analysis
  • Usage rate assumed at 0.9 (plant availability factor) but no verified usage rate found in the monitoring report; material findings flagged the 0.9 factor and a 6.5 MW vs 7.5 MW capacity discrepancy

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2011
10,377010,377
Total10,377010,377

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed barrier test (initial evidence gaps resolved)

Permanence

Avoidance project – no reversal risk

Leakage

0% deduction, 'deemed negligible' – thin justification

Baseline

Grid EF (2007) – standard for CDM but no update evidence; la

Safeguards

Mentioned but no FPIC, grievance mechanism, or feedstock sus

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status both unstated – dual-channel risk unas

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-28AMS-I.D

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents