Skip to main content
CDMHydroVietnamAMS-I.D

Doc Cay Hydropower Project

CDM-4714 ↗

#669of 1935 in Renewable energy#33of 80 in Vietnam#463of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#235of 806 in AMS-I.D

5.5/ 10
Integrity
6.0
Transparency
5.0
Claim Safety
5.5
Documentation
5.5

Audit Analysis

The Doc Cay Hydropower Project is a small grid-connected hydro scheme in Vietnam displacing coal-heavy grid electricity, with a straightforward avoidance methodology (AMS-I.D) and no inherent reversal risk. The project's core methodology is sound, but documentation carries 11 administrative material findings and two inter-document contradictions (leakage justification and ERR figures) that reduce confidence in data consistency. Key verification data points—VVB-confirmed additionality, verified ERR totals, and FNRB methodology—are absent from the extracted record, limiting the depth of assurance available.

Red Flags

  • Two contradictions between documents: leakage justification differs between the PDD (deemed negligible) and the 2020 monitoring report (quantified), and total ERR claimed differs between two monitoring reports (9,050 vs 44,482 tCO₂e)
  • Additionality test (investment) is recorded but VVB confirmation of that test is not found in the extracted data, leaving the additionality claim unverified in the available record
  • Eleven material findings and eleven corrective actions were raised by the VVB, all administrative but indicating a pattern of documentation sloppiness in the PDD and monitoring reports
  • Total ERR verified figure is not present in any extracted document, preventing independent cross-check of claimed reductions

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2015
25,680025,680
2016
29,517029,517
2017
33,959033,959
2018
33,452033,452
2019
42,864042,864
2020
44,482044,482
2021
9,05009,050
Total219,0040219,004

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Investment test present but VVB confirmation not found in re

Permanence

Avoidance project, no reversal risk or events

Leakage

0% deduction, reasonable for grid-connected hydro

Baseline

Project-specific baseline, not jurisdictional

Safeguards

Safeguards and benefit sharing mentioned; FPIC and grievance

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-28AMS-I.D

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents