Edincik Wind Power Plant
GS-223 ↗ · current registry ID: GS1368
#839of 1935 in Renewable energy#168of 295 in Turkey#501of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)#652of 1287 in ACM0002
Audit Analysis
The Edincik Wind Power Plant is a Gold Standard wind project with VVB-verified additionality and a jurisdictional baseline, but its documentation record is marred by extensive corrective actions (17 CARs, 81 CRs across cycles), multiple inter-document contradictions, and a low extraction confidence rating. The project delivered approximately 86% of its pro-rata emission reduction expectation for the elapsed monitoring period, indicating no over-crediting. Fundamental integrity risks are moderate given the inherent low-risk nature of wind avoidance credits, but data quality issues temper confidence.
Red Flags
- 17 Corrective Action Requests and 81 Clarification Requests raised across verification cycles, including incorrect baseline emission calculations using estimated rather than achieved values
- Contradiction in baseline method between the 2023 verification report (project-specific) and the 2024 verification report (jurisdictional), creating uncertainty about which baseline was actually applied
- Missing coordinates for all 30 wind turbines in the monitoring report and discrepancy between MR and PDD turbine coordinates
- Low extraction confidence across the document set, indicating at least one key document was poorly readable or incomplete
- CORSIA eligibility and CCP status not stated in any available document, leaving dual-channel risk unassessed
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 25,500 | 25,500 | 0 | |
| 2014 | 49,285 | 49,031 | 254 | |
| 2015 | 90,304 | 50,100 | 40,204 | |
| 2016 | 93,155 | 93,155 | 0 | |
| 2019 | 85,280 | 1,705 | 83,575 | |
| 2020 | 115,722 | 1,123 | 114,599 | |
| 2021 | 115,164 | 0 | 115,164 | |
| 2022 | 114,884 | 0 | 114,884 | |
| 2023 | 102,186 | 0 | 102,186 | |
| Total | 791,480 | 220,614 | 570,866 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-verified combined test
Wind avoidance, no reversal risk
0% deduction, justification inconsistent across reports
Jurisdictional but contradicted by earlier report
Grievance mechanism present, FPIC not stated
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →