GSWindKazakhstanACM0002

Energo Trust

GS-4296 ↗ · current registry ID: GS12242

#690of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)#796of 1287 in ACM0002

5.1/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
5.0
Claim Safety
5.0
Documentation
4.5

Scored2026-09-02high confidence

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Audit Analysis

The Energo Trust wind project in Kazakhstan has a VVB-confirmed investment additionality test and a reasonable 0% leakage deduction for a renewable generation project, but is undermined by a project-specific baseline (contradicted by the monitoring report), six corrective action requests, no FPIC, and seven cross-document contradictions that erode confidence in the data. The verified ERR of 126,188 tCO₂e represents roughly 83% of the 151,994 tCO₂e claimed, a moderate shortfall that warrants scrutiny.

Red Flags

  • Six Corrective Action Requests (CARs) were raised during verification, with CAR#01 still open and an additional Clarification Request (CL#02) also open, indicating unresolved quality issues in the project documentation.
  • The baseline method is contradictory: the verification report (Oct 2024) states a project-specific baseline while the monitoring report (Oct 2024) references a jurisdictional baseline, creating uncertainty about which baseline underpins the credit claims.
  • The additionality test type is inconsistent: the PDD describes a combined (investment + barrier) test, while the verification report records only an investment test, raising questions about the robustness of the additionality assessment.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2022
1,04201,042
2023
125,14683,02742,119
Total126,18883,02743,161

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed investment test

Permanence

reversal not explicitly addressed

Leakage

0% deduction, reasonable for wind

Baseline

Project-specific; contradicted by monitoring report

Safeguards

Grievance mechanism present; no FPIC

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-02ACM0002
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents →