Skip to main content
CDMBiomass EnergyIndiaACM0006

Energy efficiency improvement project at ISL

CDM-0793 ↗

#176of 352 in Biomass#770of 975 in India#1156of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#27of 81 in ACM0006

4.5/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
3.5
Claim Safety
5.0
Documentation
3.0

Audit Analysis

This CDM biomass energy project (CDM-0793, India) has a VVB-confirmed barrier additionality test and a closed validation record, but the available evidence is limited to validation-era documents from 2006 with no monitoring reports, no verified emission reductions, and a low extraction confidence rating. The project-specific baseline (contradicting the PDD's jurisdictional claim), a 0% leakage deduction with only a 'deemed negligible' justification, and the absence of any buffer pool or permanence data leave significant gaps in the integrity and claim-safety picture.

Red Flags

  • No monitoring reports or verified emission reduction figures are available in the extracted record; the 106,270 tCO2e lifetime claim cannot be cross-checked against actual performance.
  • Baseline method is contradictory: the validation report (2006-12-22) specifies a project-specific baseline while the PDD (2006-12-21) describes a jurisdictional baseline; the VVB's project-specific designation is privileged but weakens baseline robustness.
  • Leakage deduction is 0% with only a 'deemed negligible' justification and no quantified analysis, which is thin for a biomass energy project where displaced fuel or grid interaction could generate leakage.
  • No buffer pool percentage is stated, and no reversal events data exists, leaving permanence risk unquantified for a project whose crediting period ended in March 2017.
  • Minimum extraction confidence is rated low, and one of the six source documents is listed as 'unknown', reducing reliability of the extracted record.

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed barrier test

Permanence

mixed evidence / unresolved risk

Leakage

0% deduction, thin justification

Baseline

Project-specific, document contradiction

Safeguards

Safeguards mentioned, FPIC not stated

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-29ACM0006

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents