Energy Efficiency measures in DMRC - Phase III elevated stations
Score Breakdown
Integrity
verified The project uses a defined CDM methodology, AMS-II.E Version 10, and the baseline was last reassessed in 2019.
missing Additionality testing is not stated, leakage is not addressed, and reversal handling is not described in the extracted record.
Transparency
verified The PDD identifies the VVB as M/s Arcadis India Pvt. Ltd., and the record includes a crediting period and project documentation.
missing Monitoring-period details, verified emission reduction totals, and usage monitoring methods are not stated in available documents.
Claim Safety
verified The project is an energy-efficiency transport project with a project baseline and no reported material findings in the extracted record.
missing Leakage is not addressed, and there is no evidence of verified usage rates or ERR figures to check for over-crediting risk.
Documentation
verified Three evidence documents were used, including the PDD and stakeholder consultation material, and extraction confidence is high.
missing The record is still incomplete on several core fields, including monitoring period, verified reductions, and additionality evidence.
Detailed Analysis
Integrity
The project is built on AMS-II.E Version 10 and the baseline was last reassessed in 2019, which supports some methodological structure. However, additionality testing is not stated in the extracted record, the VVB confirmation of additionality is also absent, and leakage is explicitly marked as not addressed. Reversal events are not described, so permanence-related risk is not well evidenced either.
Transparency
The PDD names M/s Arcadis India Pvt. Ltd. as the VVB, and the project has a defined crediting period from 2018-06-01 to 2028-05-31. But the monitoring period is not stated, usage monitoring is not described, and both claimed and verified ERR totals are missing from the extracted record. That leaves the public accounting trail incomplete.
Claim Safety
Claim safety is weakened by the absence of verified emission reduction totals, missing usage-rate evidence, and leakage being marked as not addressed. The project type and project baseline reduce some uncertainty, but there is not enough quantified evidence here to rule out over-crediting risk. No contradictions were reported, so there is no need to privilege one source over another on conflicting facts.
Documentation
Documentation quality is moderate because three evidence documents were used, including the PDD and stakeholder consultation material, and extraction confidence is high. Even so, several key fields remain unstated, including monitoring period, additionality test type, and verified reductions. The presence of FPIC, grievance mechanism, and benefit sharing helps, but the record is still incomplete for a full-quality assessment.
Overall
Overall, this is a partially documented project with some governance and process positives, but the carbon-accounting evidence is too incomplete to score it highly. There are no contradictions in the extracted facts, so no document-priority decision was needed. The main limitations are missing additionality evidence, missing leakage treatment, and absent verified issuance data, which keep confidence in the claim modest.
Audit Analysis
This project has some procedural strengths, including a named VVB, FPIC, and a grievance mechanism, but the core carbon-accounting evidence is thin in the extracted record. Key items such as additionality testing, leakage treatment, monitoring results, and verified issuance figures are not stated, which makes the crediting claim hard to assess confidently.
Project Description
Developer: Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Type: Energy Efficiency - Transport Sector Size: Microscale Methodology: AMS-II.E. Energy efficiency and fuel switching measures for buildings Crediting period: 2018-06-01 → 2028-05-31 Estimated annual credits: 6374 tCO2e SDGs: Goal 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth, Goal 13: Climate Action, Goal 12: Responsible Production and Consumption
Red Flags
- Additionality is not evidenced in the extracted documents, and no VVB-confirmed test is stated.
- Leakage is marked as not addressed, with no quantified deduction or justification found.
- No verified or claimed ERR totals are available in the extracted record, limiting transparency and claim safety.
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 2,200 | 2,060 | 140 | |
| 2019 | 1,604 | 1,354 | 250 | |
| Total | 3,804 | 3,414 | 390 |
Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio
- Provide the verification report and monitoring report showing additionality testing, verified emission reductions, and leakage treatment.
- Disclose monitoring-period data, usage monitoring methodology, and any registry or eligibility status relevant to double-claim risk.
Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.
Risk Indicators
No additionality evidence found
Reversal handling not described
Leakage not addressed
Project baseline with reassessment date
FPIC and grievance mechanism present
CORSIA/CCP status not stated
Where to buy
+ Know where to buy this?
Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].
⚑ Dispute this rating
Sei il proprietario di questo progetto?
Correzione metadati (gratuita)
Nome, paese, marketplace o link errati? Segnalacelo.
Non modifica lo score.
[email protected] →Rivalutazione con nuovi documenti
Hai documentazione aggiornata non ancora inclusa? Puoi richiedere un nuovo run della pipeline con i nuovi input.
Invia Documenti →