Skip to main content
CDMEE supply sideIndiaAMS-II.D

Energy Efficiency through Alteration of fuel oil atomizing media in coal-fired thermal power plant

CDM-0987 ↗

#242of 1329 in Industrial#378of 975 in India#537of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#4of 12 in AMS-II.D

5.4/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
5.0
Claim Safety
5.5
Documentation
5.5

Audit Analysis

A CDM energy-efficiency project in an Indian coal-fired power plant with a VVB-confirmed barrier additionality test and a reasonable 0% leakage deduction, but weakened by a project-specific baseline, four corrective actions on the monitoring plan, and several key MRV parameters (FNRB, usage monitoring method, verified ERR) that are absent from the extracted record. The project delivered roughly 97% of its pro-rata expected emissions reductions for the monitored period, indicating no material over-crediting.

Red Flags

  • Four corrective actions were required in the monitoring report (2011), including wrong table references for baseline parameters, insufficient steam-flow monitoring frequency, and a non-conservative station heat rate calculation — indicating the initial monitoring plan had material gaps.
  • The additionality test type appears as 'combined' in the 2007 validation report and 'barrier' in the 2012 validation report, suggesting the additionality case was simplified over time; the barrier test is the weakest of the three CDM tests.
  • No buffer pool or permanence mechanism is documented, and no reversal events are reported, leaving the permanence of the energy-efficiency gains unquantified.
  • The verified ERR figure for the monitoring period is not present in the extracted record, preventing a direct cross-check against the PDD's lifetime estimate.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2008
129,0360129,036
2009
29,239029,239
2010
29,470029,470
Total187,7450187,745

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Barrier test (weakest CDM test); originally combined per 200

Permanence

no revers

Leakage

0% deduction, deemed negligible — reasonable for in-plant EE

Baseline

Project-specific baseline; no reassessment date found

Safeguards

Safeguards mentioned and benefit-sharing described; FPIC and

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in extracted record

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-29AMS II D

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents