Eris Viransehir PV Project
#672of 1935 in Renewable energy#7of 75 in TR#12of 154 in Intl. Carbon Registry (ICR)#519of 1287 in ACM0002
Audit Analysis
The Eris Viransehir PV Project is a grid-connected solar PV avoidance project in Turkey with verified additionality and low permanence risk, but it suffers from significant documentation gaps including the absence of any monitoring or verification reports, a low extraction confidence rating, and multiple unresolved contradictions between the PDD and validation report. The core project design is sound for a renewable energy avoidance credit, yet the lack of post-issuance data and the volume of material findings (14 items) limit confidence in the ongoing integrity of the claims.
Red Flags
- No monitoring report or verification report found in the extracted record; total ERR verified is not stated, leaving no independent confirmation that claimed reductions are being delivered
- Baseline method is contradictory: the PDD (2025-01-15) describes it as jurisdictional while the validation report (2025-01-15) describes it as project-specific, creating ambiguity about the baseline's robustness
- Fourteen material findings and fourteen corrective actions were raised by the VVB, including missing monitoring frequency, absent EIA report on the registry, and unaddressed risk discussion
- Minimum extraction confidence is rated low, indicating at least one key document was poorly readable, reducing reliability of the extracted data
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 207 | 0 | 207 | |
| 2024 | 25,268 | 0 | 25,268 | |
| 2025 | 25,268 | 0 | 25,268 | |
| 2026 | 25,268 | 0 | 25,268 | |
| 2027 | 25,268 | 0 | 25,268 | |
| 2028 | 25,268 | 0 | 25,268 | |
| 2029 | 25,268 | 0 | 25,268 | |
| 2030 | 25,268 | 0 | 25,268 | |
| 2031 | 25,268 | 0 | 25,268 | |
| 2032 | 25,268 | 0 | 25,268 | |
| 2033 | 25,061 | 0 | 25,061 | |
| Total | 252,680 | 0 | 252,680 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed combined test
Avoidance type, no reversals
0% deduction, justification inconsistent across docs
Method contradictory between PDD and validation report
FPIC and grievance mechanism documented
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →