Skip to main content
CDMBiomass EnergyIndiaGeneral Methodologyv2.1

"Forced Methane extraction from Organic wastewater", at Mandya District, Karnataka by M/s Sri Chamundeswari Sugars Ltd.

CDM-1088 ↗

#121of 352 in Biomass#624of 975 in India#913of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)

4.8/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
4.5
Claim Safety
4.0
Documentation
5.0

Audit Analysis

A CDM biogas capture project at a sugar factory in Karnataka with VVB-confirmed additionality and a recognised methodology (AMS.III.H v4), but undermined by a ten-fold discrepancy in claimed emission reductions between the PDD and validation report, an initially unclear baseline power source, a fixed 2004 grid emission factor applied across the full crediting period, and a thin 0% leakage justification. Multiple corrective actions were required at validation, and the verified ERR for the 2011–2012 monitoring period was not found in the extracted record.

Red Flags

  • Ten-fold discrepancy in total ERR between the PDD (344,240 tCO2e, Jan 2007) and the validation report (34,424 tCO2e, Apr 2007) — a data-reliability concern that cannot be fully resolved without the original calculation sheets
  • Baseline power source (grid vs diesel) was initially unclear in the PDD and required a corrective action; the grid emission factor of 0.86 tCO2e/MWh was fixed ex ante from 2004 data for the entire 10-year crediting period, risking over-crediting as India's grid decarbonises
  • Verified ERR for the 2011–2012 monitoring period is not present in the extracted record, preventing any pro-rata delivery check

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2011
26,630026,630
2012
28,027028,027
Total54,657054,657

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test (AMS.III.H v4)

Permanence

no reversal events recorded

Leakage

0% deduction, 'deemed negligible' without quantified boundary

Baseline

Project-specific, modeled; grid EF fixed at 2004 value; initially unclear power source

Safeguards

Safeguards and benefit-sharing mentioned; FPIC and grievance mechanism not stated

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-01General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents