Skip to main content
CDMBiomass EnergyChileACM0006

Forestal y Papelera Concepción Biomass Residues Cogeneration Plant in Chile

CDM-2264 ↗

#224of 352 in Biomass#23of 31 in Chile#1332of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#35of 81 in ACM0006

4.1/ 10
Integrity
3.5
Transparency
4.0
Claim Safety
5.0
Documentation
4.0

Audit Analysis

This CDM biomass cogeneration project in Chile was verified by Allianz Zero Emissions but the 2012 monitoring report flagged eleven material findings, including a biomass composition that deviated sharply from the PDD (73% market sawdust versus 30% projected), an investment analysis not conducted per the CDM additionality Tool, and a leakage assessment that was not performed in accordance with the methodology. Seven corrective actions were required, and several key monitoring parameters (FNRB method, usage monitoring, verified ERR) are absent from the extracted record. The project over-delivered relative to its pro-rata expectation, but the underlying baseline and additionality documentation carry significant quality concerns.

Red Flags

  • Eleven material findings in the 2012 monitoring report, including incorrect emission-reduction calculations, undefined baseline scenarios, and a monitoring plan missing key parameters (AVDy, Qproject plant,y)
  • Biomass feedstock composition in operation (73% market sawdust) differed by more than double from the PDD projection (30%), undermining the baseline model
  • Investment analysis was not carried out according to the CDM Tool for demonstration and assessment of additionality, despite the VVB confirming a combined test
  • Leakage was deemed negligible at 0% but the assessment was not conducted in accordance with the methodology initially
  • Seven corrective actions were required, including re-approval of PDD changes for increased capacity and participant changes

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed but investment analysis not per CDM Tool

Permanence

mixed evidence / unresolved risk

Leakage

0% deemed negligible but not assessed per methodology initia

Baseline

Project-specific, scenarios unclear in initial PDD, no reass

Safeguards

Safeguards mentioned but FPIC, grievance, benefit-sharing no

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-29ACM0006, ACM0002

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents