Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
EN
ScoredCDMHydroBrazilVintage 2008, 2012, 2013Registry: RegisteredACM0002

Fundão-Santa Clara Energetic Complex Project (FSCECP)

Developer: ELEJOR-Centrais Eletricas do Rio Jordao S.A

CDM-1279 ↗

#3096of 5087 in Renewable energy#271of 500 in Brazil#3117of 5740 in CDM (UNFCCC)#2210of 3484 in ACM0002

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 5.1 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Analysis

Fundão-Santa Clara Energetic Complex Project (FSCECP) (Brazil) generates grid-connected renewable electricity (hydroelectric, UHE Santa Clara: 120.168 MW (2 turbo-generators of 60.084 MW each); UHE Fundão: 120.168 MW (2 turbo-generators of 60.084 MW each); PCH Santa Clara: 3.6 MW (1 turbo-generator); PCH Fundão: 2.475 MW (1 turbo-generator)) under ACM0002 version 6; registry status Registered (CDM), 1,613,374 credits issued in 2010–2015. The documents name Bureau Veritas Quality International as validation / verification body. The latest monitoring report (2010-05-01 – 2011-08-31) reports 370,237 tCO2e achieved.

Red Flags

No red flags detected.

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 11 registry documents (9 read).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

Transactions in the CDM registry are discontinued as of 31 December 2026 (UNFCCC, checked 6 October 2026). The UNEP-CCC Article 6 Pipeline lists the transition of this activity to the Article 6.4 mechanism as approved. This page keeps the project's record and our analysis.

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish CORSIA eligibility per project.

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: project sector

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2010
234,1470234,147
2012
704,5260704,526
2015
674,7010674,701
Total1,613,37401,613,374

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

Marketplaces

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceACM0002 version 6

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →