CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index BuyersCORSIA supplyCheck an offerAPI & MCP Method About the System Editorial Policy Score Your Project
EN
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index
← All projects
Re-assessment pendingGSWindTurkeyRegistry: RegisteredACM0002

Geres Wind Power Project, Turkey

Developer: Innores Elektrik Uretim A.S

GS-219 ↗ · current registry ID: GS1364

Worked comparison example (English)

#1698of 5087 in Renewable energy#203of 431 in Türkiye#567of 2172 in Gold Standard (GS)#1219of 3484 in ACM0002

Score from methodology v2.1 (analysis of 4 Sep 2026). Re-assessment under v2.2 pending.

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 5.9 / 10
Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒
Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Re-assessment pending · v2.1

Scored2026-09-04medium confidence

evidence: 33/39 registry documents analyzed · 4 red flags

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Analysis

The Geres Wind Power Project is a straightforward renewable energy project with VVB-confirmed additionality, no reversal events, and a reasonable zero-leakage treatment appropriate for grid-connected wind. However, the project-specific baseline, numerous inter-document contradictions, low extraction confidence, and missing FNRB/usage data introduce moderate uncertainty. The project delivered approximately 101% of its pro-rata ex-ante expectation for the monitoring period, indicating no material over- or under-crediting.

Red Flags

4 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

On this page: the analysis of 4 Sep 2026, marked “Re-assessment pending”. Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, 4 red flags, score factors, detailed analysis, and 39 registry documents (33 analyzed).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology not approved by ICVCMACM0002

    The Integrity Council assessed this methodology as not meeting the Core Carbon Principles.

    Source: ICVCM assessment

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: registry label

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-09-27

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2014
35,33035,3300
2015
60,43060,4300
2016
70,42070,4200
2017
67,40862,4384,970
2018
67,43967,39940
2019
68,81768,8170
2020
71,12935,90935,220
2021
73,68024,84248,838
2022
80,31575,8294,486
2023
69,22668,232994
2024
77,015077,015
2025
19,459019,459
Total760,668569,646191,022

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2014–2015ACM0002 v14.0since replaced by v22.0

    verification report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2015–2016ACM0002 v14.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  3. 2016–2017ACM0002 v14.0since replaced by v22.0

    verification report

    official page · verified on

  4. 2017–2018ACM0002 v14.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  5. 2018–2019ACM0002 v14.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  6. 2020–2021ACM0002 v14.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  7. 2021–2022ACM0002 v20.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  8. 2022–2023ACM0002 v20.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  9. 2023–2024ACM0002 v20.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  10. 2024–2025ACM0002 v20.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  • ACM0002: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records.

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceACM0002
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →