Gezin Solar Power Project

Integrity

The monitoring report (2021) reports 13,936 tCO2e verified and notes no material findings and no corrective actions, which supports implementation quality. Additionality is indicated as confirmed by the VVB in the extracted record, consistent with a VCS renewable energy project. However, the baseline is described only as project-specific and the grid emission factor (and any reassessment timing) is not found in the extracted record, which reduces confidence in the baseline emissions calculation underpinning the ERs.

Transparency

The monitoring report (2021) provides a clear monitoring period (2018-01-15 to 2021-08-31) and a verified ER total of 13,936 tCO2e, and the VVB is identified as LGAI Technological Center, S.A. (Applus+ Certification). At the same time, the claimed ER total is not found in the extracted record, preventing a direct claimed-versus-verified comparison. Key calculation inputs such as the grid emission factor and leakage handling are also not transparently available in the extracted fields.

Claim Safety

As a solar PV grid-connected project under AMS-I.D, the main claim risk typically hinges on correct grid emission factor selection and conservative monitoring of net electricity supplied. In the extracted record, the grid emission factor value/year is not found, and leakage is marked as not addressed with no stated deduction, which increases over-crediting uncertainty even if expected leakage is low. CORSIA eligibility and CCP status are not stated in available documents, so buyers face added uncertainty when making higher-integrity or aviation-related claims.

Documentation

The evidence set includes a monitoring report, validation report, and PDD, with 8 documents used and high extraction confidence, which supports a relatively strong documentation score. The monitoring report is dated 2021-10-07 and aligns with the stated monitoring period end (2021-08-31), indicating reasonable recency. Nonetheless, several important fields are not found or not specified in the extracted record (e.g., additionality test type, grid emission factor details), suggesting gaps in what is publicly captured or extracted.

Overall

No contradictions were identified in the extracted record, so there is no need to privilege one document value over another. The project scores as mid-range: it benefits from VVB involvement, a defined monitoring period, and no reported findings, but is held back by missing baseline quantification details (grid emission factor) and incomplete leakage treatment in the extracted data. If documentation were to fall below 3.0, transparency would be capped post-scoring; and if integrity were below 4.0, the overall would be capped at 6.0—neither gate is triggered by these scores.